If that makes any sense


NAH I get it haha. don't worry! the appeal in the taboo is very enticing, ia (I mean, any situation usually it is). and if you're having trouble explaining yourself then it's okay too; everyone has different tastes, you found a diamond in the rough. I guess the level of creepy-tolerance differs from person to person.
on my side, after seeing one particular gif, I don't think I'll be seeing this movie anytime soon. at least not sober

you can't really dismiss the costumes because it's so out of the norm. take into account of the 'why's as well:
- the costume itself allows the greatest amount of movement, for one important thing. with loose fitting clothes, the costume wearer is at risk to having it getting caught in the area around them and/or being grabbed in a fight. also it's very aerodynamic for flight, the form-fitting material doesn't run the risk of in-air complications.
- a countless number of superheroes don't just wear "tights," the material of what they wear is usually enhanced with some sort of bullet-proof, chemical-resistant component. it helps in life and death situations. not to mention sometimes the material allows the wearer to freely use their powers without any collateral damage. think: The Flash.
- quick-changing. some superheroes hide their true selves with masks in their day-to-day lives. they need to keep up the mirage if they want any semblance of a normal life, but as the life of a superhero, the call for help is never far away - the costume wearer needs to shed their skin as fast as possible and save the day. the form-fitting "tights" are easy and comfortable enough to fit underneath their civvies. unlike telephone booths, there is always a free alleyway available for a quick super fast strip-tease.
and no comment on the bathing suits. it's not that complicated, but it is controversial (thankfully).
marketing, aesthetics, and consistency. in terms of marketing: sex sells. comics have always had a target audience and that target audience enjoy, if not don't even mind, their women to kick ass while half naked. with aesthetics? one can say that a super heroine uses her body as an advantage against men who get off on physical appeal. I myself don't really buy this. it's pretty obvious that the big-time bad dudes get enjoyment out of other appeals (sadistic actions, power, greed, destruction, money, etc) instead of physical intimacy. in fact, it's really annoying to think that women need to walk around in bikinis to defeat their enemies which are implied to be only sex-craving thugs. so frustrating. if anything, I really don't think I'd be able to kick ass if my crotch was hanging out everywhere, but I can understand that comics - while being open-minded towards their female readers - really cater to heterosexual men.
all of this is consistent and it works I guess. I don't know the numbers when it comes to sales, but my guess is that even though this topic is a touchy one, it's profitable and ensures positive results (again from the expected audience). now that I think about it, I know of only a few heroines that aren't made to depend on their costumes to measure their strength and fighting prowess (but then again, I'm relatively new to comic-land, so there might be quite a few that I'm not taking into account).
mte. I can't wrap my mind around how easily dismissive some people are with such broad subjects.
on-topic:
THE NOTEBOOK - OGOD IDGAF JUDGE ME IF YOU MUST BUT OMG I WAS SO GODDAMM BORED WHEN I FIRST SAW IT. RACHEL ILU BUT MAN WHAT.
(okay not the 'worst' I've ever seen, but I feel that the hype made me hate it even more)