I just wanted to add a few things, because I'm bored:
Naruto didn't love Hinata instantly eight years ago. It was a gradual growing process. The Last served to explain that Naruto did not understand love. This is not a Retcon either, as it doesn't differentiate anything shown before, but serves to help make it clearer for those who didn't understand, the Sage of Six Paths also points out that if Naruto pointed his eye inward, he's understand a lot more about himself, which really highlights something also displayed consistently, Naruto does not always understand his own emotions. It took him a long time to understand Sasuke.
I think I have a Dejavu.
The 'process' started with the confession scene.
You can't count the proud failure speech; I won't elaborate this, you know why it can't.
And it wasn't gradual. It was a clear and distinct three-step-process: Pain-War-Last
There is nothing to suggest otherwise, it is never stated anywhere that it went differently, and one was easily able to observe this.
What does this random quote of the Sage have to do with romance?
Where did Naruto not understand his own emotions? Please show me an example, I am really curious.
He didn't understand Sasuke because he himself hadn't lost family. He didn't know how it feels to lose his family, his loved ones, his everyday life - that was why he couldn't grasp Sasuke's emotions fully.
It has nothing to do with a emotional inability.
I think you missed a whole important part of the series. You should really reread into his 'relationship' with Sasuke.
You KNOW the Last doesn't work with your interpretation of it. But somehow you are still repeating it. I thought we had discussed this here and you had nothing left to add.
They only use the 'doesn't understand,-never-realizes' motives they use in The Last because they don't have any development given by Kishi for the 2-year-gap and have to make it fast. I can guarantee you that it would have never been explained like in The Last, if there would have been more time/a different plattform to show it.
It isn't even because of NH (OK partly, because it was not really developed in the Manga), it's, like you said a few weeks ago, because of the problem to fit it all into one movie with adding a story to it.
Plus people are really overinterpretating The Last. It is not THAT complex, and Naruto's love for Hinata is not a fairytale 'I-grew-to-see-who-you-really-are-and-you-are-everything-in-my-life-soulmate-most-beautiful-thing-on-the-world-I-would-die-for-you' love. It is purely resolution-driven and happens only because you can't let Hinata and Naruto hanging.
"Him saying how he hates people who lie to themselves but then it results he lied to himself about loving his own teammate, which resulted in her almost getting killed!!!"
Naruto actually never says he loves Sakura in the manga. I don't want to say that Naruto didn't love her, but this is a good point to understand. Sakura serves to further elaborate on this love/crush, that it wasn't the same as the sort of love he had for Hinata, it was a rivalry, which also isn't a Retcon, as it keeps in pace with what is established in the manga.
She doesn't compare it with Naruto's love for Hinata. She compares it with her love for Sasuke and Hinata's love for him.
It wouldn't even make sense at all for her to compare it in that situation with his love for Hinata.
Where is it established that it is a rivalry? Please explain and show me that.
You know that it goes against the dynamics introduced in chapter 3. And literally every scene afterwards.
It doesn't matter that he never says that.
It wouldn't matter if he would hate her like hell.
I honestly don't understand with what you are even trying to argument here. The things you write have nothing to do with what was written above it, but still:
SHE THINKS that he loves her. I doesn't matter if this is true or not. If The Last is correct, Naruto is acting there like a egoistic drama queen. Not to say that the whole scene would make no sense. And your so called trial.
(A short semi-random insertion: Do you know what makes Sai's dialogue with Naruto beforehand so much more fraught with meaning? Because it is a mirror image to his "How can I be Hokage, if I even can't save a friend?" speech.)
"Naruto wasn't never the perfect human being, as some people think he is (like Hinata or you maybe I don't know) he said the guy who killed his parents was the coolest guy ever, he was totally okay with his "best friend" Sasuke when he almost killed the love of his life(oh wait the last retcon, nah never mind that got fixed)"
If you re-read the Proud Failure Speech, you'll have Hinata specifically say that Naruto is flawed, but what she likes about him is that he keeps standing up -despite- those flaws. I also acknowledge Naruto isn't perfect, and never have said he was. Really, Naruto's remark on Obito is in line with the character, he's forgiving, and he's referring to the Good in Obito. But this quote is taken out of context, literally sometimes, put in a panel with a bunch of dead people around. No, Naruto was not okay with Sasuke killing his friends, he was determined to stop him, being the only force standing in his way that could stop him at the end of the Manga.
The Last didn't make Naruto OOC, nor do "anything", really to him.
Oh great, again Hinata, sighh.
Don't get me wrong, I love that scene, but do you really have to use every little tiny opportunity to go into NH?
Please, it only looks bad. The speech has nothing to do with the problems faced with Sasuke, Nagato, Obito and the war. It has nothing to do with questions of morality.
Plus the motives addressed in the speech are all thrown over board in part 2(And I remember you calling that fact 'not bad writing'.)
You don't understand. What he does IS in line with how his character develops later.
But that's not a good thing. Not at all. Naruto loses every kind of rationality. What he is talking about is turning into bullsh*t that maybe would work on a ideal phantasy world with phantasy humans.
The worst thing is: It actually kinda works and there is nearly zero objection.
I personally can live with Sasuke.
But the Akatsuki/Madara thing is ridiculous.
Two examples:
-His fight with Pain. We get to know extensively Nagato's backstory, what he lived through, why he does what he does, and so on. Most of the leaf is DEAD. Naruto's loved ones are dead.
But during the talk between the two this doesn't matter, Naruto only cares about his own picture of a future perfect world, and his "I don't have an answer yet, but will do my best" somehow gives Nagato hope again. Wtf? What happened? We are talking about the same person that killed his teacher that saved him, without showing any reservations.
And afterwards magically Nagato has the power to revive everyone again. Voilà, Naruto doesn't have to live with any consequences anymore. Great.
-Obito. He makes Naruto eat his own words of "not letting anyone die" with killing several persons around him. He shows him the cruelties and the hopelessness. That he lied to Nagato back in the cave and has no real opinion of how to make things better.
But what's the result? Same procedure as with Nagato.
I can't believe how they threw such promising things out of the window so easily.
And the cycle of hatred is somehow broken because they fought against a single enemy who was dealt with. Okay, but what has this to do with the problems Nagato talked about? And doesn't it only confirm what Madara was talking about? What was Naruto's role in everything beside simply beating the enemy, what did he do except helping dead people find peace? Why should the living people change now (except the high militaries of the major villages)?
It's disappointing really, he changed nothing.
Edited by Aevrum, 06 August 2017 - 11:12 PM.