I see a lot of arguments where they say that Hinata can beat Sakura because she has her byakugan and she can cut off Sakura's chakra point easily so she would just whittle Sakura down hit by hit.
I had an argument about this because I showed them that Sakura, according to third databook stats, beats out Hinata in almost every category easily save for taijutsu, but the taijutsu is only maybe a half a point difference while Sakura's stats are one to two points difference from Hinata. No matter how many times I showed proof or showed stats, they refused to accept Hinata losing. They kept claiming Hinata was a better fighter, but I explained that out of all the fights Hinata has fought she has only won one of them. Sakura has won over half her fights. They say that Hinata is faster, but the stats say Sakura is faster. As you showed, they say the byakugan helps her win, but I brought up that Naruto has beaten Neji and he actually tricked the byakugan easily.
That is when they started to jsut say "Hinata wins because I said so." That's when I just said that they can't debate for nothing and refused to accept that Sakura is better. Hell, I even explained that Sakura even has talents in medical which could be the chakra scalpel which can be used as a weapon and poisons. So even just a scratch on Hinata with a poisoned Kunai could end the match easily.
I had a similar argument where they said databooks are false as it says Kakashi & Itachi are equal ..but it's not so
later...the guy started arguing over chunin exam arc & Pein arc
that made the argument almost like fighting with a kid for lolipop ..
It sucks ..!!
Edited by Princess Iris, 06 October 2014 - 02:23 AM.