PachucoDesigns

You evidently don't have eyes on the front of your heads, either, as I see things happen here all the time that you constantly accuse me of, and they go completely ignored. I came here because I was invited here, and because I assumed that I would be among like-minded individuals. Instead, what I find are self-deluding fanatics who run and cry for the mods every time anyone says anything that does not fit into the "NS FTW, NH SMH" cookie cutter. I do not disturb these boards. As I said before, I simply articulate my thoughts clearly without passive-aggressive emoticons. Rest assured, I've pretty much seen the uselessness in "debating" with the vast majority of you. I don't intend to "disturb" your fan discussions any further.

Do not threaten me with being banned. Throwing your weight around toward me like that just proves my point, as does you looming here to try and lecture me. This place has the potential to be nice, but so far, it's proving to be nothing more than recycled mantras and circle jerks. And you can trust me when I say this: I am not the only member here who thinks so.

EDIT: And as a side note, I find it truly hilarious that this iblog is getting a lot more views now that I have the mods buckling down on me. lol

Your offense at the picture is ridiculous and seriously lacks a sense of humor. It is not racist, it is minimally offensive short of the swearing. Don't like the swearing? I suggest you comb through your members list and take a look at some of the signatures and pictures, because I've seen plenty that seem to pass under your radar. Yes, I do believe you have a personal vendetta against me, and rightfully so. It is currently impossible for me to post anything at all that is not either ignored outright or taken as combative simply because it does not fall in line with the same, tired NS arguments fit for bobble headed sheep, and is not laced with passive-aggressive emoticons.

Your "debate" threads are a joke, as are your cowardly "agree to disagree or we will close the thread" policies. Do you enjoy being the moderator to overly sensitive, single-minded children?

I can't believe how many people here have actually convinced themselves that Kishimoto gives a crap one way or the other about the pairing wars. Isn't this supposed to be the debate thread? Where is the irrefutable proof for this? Because so far, all I see are countless instances of begging the question, over thinking and wild speculation. This is the equivalent of a man running a puppet theater for his bread and butter, hearing a fanatical audience obsessing over certain puppets, and then thinking he is doing things behind the veil just to antagonize the fans. Do you really think he intends to risk upsetting the fans, effectively trumping his own sales? It's ridiculous. He says that he has changes planned, but that most likely simply means changes that are to be expected in the story, not changes he decided to make to his plans at the last minute on the suggestion of the shippers.

I know what it's like to create a character in both personality/history profile and visual design. And there is no way he's spent all of that time perfecting his characters just to aggravate NS or NH. The flaws you find in Hinata? The things that annoy you? Those flaws are planned and intentional.

Of course it's just awful, it's Michael Bay. The guy has movie explosion tourret's syndrome. Just once, I'd like to see him take on a romantic comedy, or something. See how long he can go without a car/plane/bomb/small animal blowing up.



I wouldn't call that movie an old classic. Not by a long shot. But it's Scorsese's finest, and I've yet to see anything by that man that hasn't been fantastic. Have you see The Color of Money? The man can even make Tom Cruise look good.

Correct. Two other characters about whom I'm sure he "gives a hoot."