19964 replies to this topic

[TouKen4Life3g]

They are both 16. If Sakura is born on March and Naruto in October, is clear she is the oldest one.
And the factor here is, again, Sasuke. He is born in July. And is the same year as the other two. If Sakura would've been younger, she would have had to be 11 when the Academy started. So it's Sakura, Sasuke, Naruto.

When did the series begin in? Who to say they got the same school schedule as in the real world. I heard Sasuke was already 16 during the introduction of part 2. I don't know, I would let it pass until, doubtful, Kishi shows her birth before or after the incident.

[redragon88]

They are both 16. If Sakura is born on March and Naruto in October, is clear she is the oldest one.
And the factor here is, again, Sasuke. He is born in July. And is the same year as the other two. If Sakura would've been younger, she would have had to be 11 when the Academy started. So it's Sakura, Sasuke, Naruto.

That is all speculation. There's not evidence she was born in the same year. There is just none.

Please, give me an actual indicator that she was born in the same year and I'll concede. The problem is right now everyone is just assuming simply because her birthday comes first. A birthday coming first doesn't indicate being born first, it doesn't work like that.

I think everyone was younger then 11 when they started the academy, in a flashback I remember everyone looking around 8 or 9 years old. I don't get what you mean by being 11.

[Chatte]

When did the series begin in? Who to say they got the same school schedule as in the real world. I heard Sasuke was already 16 during the introduction of part 2. I don't know, I would let it pass until, doubtful, Kishi shows her birth before or after the incident.

But what does the schedule in real world has to do with it? The were all there in the same academy year. Which makes them all the same year. Sannins were all promoted at 6, which makes them the same age group, again, leading us to what I previously said.

[TouKen4Life3g]

But what does the schedule in real world has to do with it? The were all there in the same academy year. Which makes them all the same year. Sannins were all promoted at 6, which makes them the same age group, again, leading us to what I previously said.

Anything can start with any age. Didn't Naruto failed multiple times? I don't even know what that means? I thought he was older because they made it seem like he was held back for more than a year. Actually, do we know how the school system works? It's seriously ambiguous. Like I said, I guess it all depends on the time she was born either before or after the incident. That's the only way to find the answer. Until then, I can't and won't choose one.

[Chatte]

Gah, I will try to look on some stuff when I get back to explain why she is the oldest.

[redragon88]

But what does the schedule in real world has to do with it? The were all there in the same academy year. Which makes them all the same year. Sannins were all promoted at 6, which makes them the same age group, again, leading us to what I previously said.

The problem is that there's no way to determine when does a Konoha academy year start. We can't just assume they put together all of the kids that are born the same year. We don't really know how they divide the age groups in the academy.

[StriderC]

That is all speculation. There's not evidence she was born in the same year. There is just none.

Please, give me an actual indicator that she was born in the same year and I'll concede. The problem is right now everyone is just assuming simply because her birthday comes first. A birthday coming first doesn't indicate being born first, it doesn't work like that.

I think everyone was younger then 11 when they started the academy, in a flashback I remember everyone looking around 8 or 9 years old. I don't get what you mean by being 11.

Agreed. While it's possible she could be older, it's also possible she could be younger.

The databook saying Sasuke was already 16 could bounce to any side. I'm not sure since I've never read it, but did it say he was 16 when he first came back in Part 2, or when Naruto comes back into the picture? One could simply say that enough time had passed to the point that he recently turned 16 when he had first arrived. Now, this wouldn't work if Naruto was already 16 considering A LOT of time would of have to have passed at that point, and that much time hasn't. I mean, it's clear some things are missed, and days/weeks pass but it's really hard to gauge who's older than who without an official time line. I thought she was older, but I need more proof...

The problem is that there's no way to determine when does a Konoha academy year start. We can't just assume they put together all of the kids that are born the same year. We don't really know how they divide the age groups in the academy.

It almost feels like a school system. I was born ALMOST a year after some of the people in my class considering my birthday was in May. Example

July 21, 1988
May 21, 1989

And this is actually a real birthday. LOL Anyway, he was almost a year older than I, and yet we were still in the same year as far as school went.

Edited by StriderC, 30 April 2013 - 03:28 PM.

[redragon88]

@StriderC

Yeah, I'm glad you understand what I'm referring to.

[Slextrem]

I don't understand why any of this matters...

[redragon88]

I don't understand why any of this matters...

It doesn't really.

What I'm trying to proof is that until further evidence Sakura can either be younger or older. It can go both ways and I want people to understand that at the very least.

Edited by redragon88, 30 April 2013 - 03:40 PM.

[StriderC]

@StriderC

Yeah, I'm glad you understand what I'm referring to.

No problem, and yeah I do.

Slextrem

It MATTERS BECAUSE IT MATTERS DAMMITTTTT!! LMAO! Jk. It really doesn't. I was just bringing up the point that it could go either way and that it's not concrete unless Kishi throws us a timeline of some sort...

[Chatte]

Wait a minute, I have Sakura's databook! I only need Naruto's and that's it!

Edited by Chatte, 30 April 2013 - 03:48 PM.

[redragon88]

ait a minute, I have Sakura's databook! I only need Naruto's and that's it!

I'm pretty sure they just indicate the day and month they where born, not the year. But hey, I'm open to being proven wrong.

That Naruto going for the older gals. He still has nothing on Shikamaru though.

[Dkey]

The Sun wont rise tomorrow if we cant figure if Sakura is 7 months older or 4 months younger than Naruto

Edited by Dkey, 30 April 2013 - 03:49 PM.

[StriderC]

The Sun wont rise tomorrow if we cant figure if Sakura is 7 months older or 4 months younger than Naruto

*looks outside* Looks like that's only according to you my friend. You'd better figure it out quickly.

[Dkey]

*looks outside* Looks like that's only according to you my friend. You'd better figure it out quickly.

1st of May mate free day for me so can't give a damn

[TouKen4Life3g]

I don't understand why any of this matters...

It doesn't. It's one way to pass time while we wait for next chapter.

I'm pretty sure they just indicate the day and month they where born, not the year. But hey, I'm open to being proven wrong.

That Naruto going for the older gals. He still has nothing on Shikamaru though.

Well, he won't be the first to date an older girl. Still, I really didn't know Temari is that old.

[Chatte]

I am curious, lol!
So I won't have this stuck out from my mind until I figure it out, lol!

[StriderC]

1st of May mate free day for me so can't give a damn

LOL It's still the 30th here. You're in the futureeeeeeee.

[Chatte]

Would the ninja registry number count? Hmmm.... Sakura has 601 and Sasuke has 606