The NEW NaruSaku Debate Thread!
#1681
Posted 08 October 2010 - 09:08 PM
but we have alot more action coming ad some drama with sasuke soo maybee it will come up
---
#1682
Posted 08 October 2010 - 09:09 PM
In all the NaruSaku moments that we have ( manga and/or anime) what is/are the moment(s) that you wish to be different? If so, which one(s) and how you would have like it?
To me, it's the feeding scene. I know it mainly a comic relief but I'm sure that it could have the same effect if Sakura actually fed Naruto. I would have done something like this:
Maybe Kishimoto could possibly make a second feeding scene but without any interruptions this time around.
#1683
Posted 08 October 2010 - 10:33 PM
---
#1684
Posted 08 October 2010 - 11:14 PM
Edited by Gravenimage, 08 October 2010 - 11:58 PM.
#1685
Posted 08 October 2010 - 11:54 PM
I wish that there was more romance nbut this is a action manga not a sope opera lol
---
#1686
Posted 09 October 2010 - 12:26 AM
#1687
Posted 12 October 2010 - 02:18 AM
#1688
Posted 12 October 2010 - 02:33 AM
don't care about Wiki at all. ANYONE i repeat ANYONE can edit it. So what do you expect, people are going to say biased stuff. Most probably its some naruhina or sasusaku fan who wrote it. Are you going to expect anything more from them?
#1689
Posted 12 October 2010 - 02:46 AM
i guess i would expect them to be a little more mature, but than again, i'm an optimist.
#1690
Posted 12 October 2010 - 02:48 AM
It means that Naruto wiki is baised they obviously support NH and SS. Even if Kishimoto stated that during the confession he thought he was making Sakura as a "honest and surprinsingly determined girl".
#1691
Posted 12 October 2010 - 02:53 AM
Having trouble finding where exactly it says this, so someone probably already changed it. Honestly we don't need to be up in arms about this kinda stuff. If people feel the need to do such things then let them, and if a person based his/hers opinions on a statement found on a wiki then it isn't much of a loss to us.
#1692
Posted 12 October 2010 - 03:01 AM
Nothing.
It simply means the person who made the addition thought it was fake. That's it. I wouldn't lose sleep over what shows up on Wiki for the reasons stated above.
#1693
Posted 12 October 2010 - 05:49 AM
No. The Wiki itself is not biased. You cannot call content biased. You can call the people who edit the content biased, since all Wiki-affiliated sites are free to edit from any IP address.
Which is why Wikipedia locks controversial topics on its pages, so people can't edit them.
#1694
Posted 13 October 2010 - 12:58 AM
Kishimoto is the only one who knows who naruto willl end up with and we have interpeetted this, while some of us (Nh and SS fans) still are oblivious to all relationship "points" so to say. Example, the word Tsundere. Some know what is means some dont.. But they imply that sakura will end up with sasuke amd hinata will be with naruto b/c she is a "main" character... Hmmm last time i chwcked hinata was a SUPPORT character. What is you take on this you guys.. I am confused in a way. Someone help.. I am confused about Hinata being a Tsundere.
---
#1695
Posted 13 October 2010 - 01:16 AM
Kishimoto is the only one who knows who naruto willl end up with and we have interpeetted this, while some of us (Nh and SS fans) still are oblivious to all relationship "points" so to say. Example, the word Tsundere. Some know what is means some dont.. But they imply that sakura will end up with sasuke amd hinata will be with naruto b/c she is a "main" character... Hmmm last time i chwcked hinata was a SUPPORT character. What is you take on this you guys.. I am confused in a way. Someone help.. I am confused about Hinata being a Tsundere.
Hinata has absolutely NOTHING as a tsundere she's the shy girl that likes the main protagonist I have seen this kind of character in other shounen mangas before. The tsundere is the girl that acts cold and mean to the protagonist but with time she starts being love struck or in complete denial of her feelings for the main protagonist (in comic relief scenes the author will always make the tsundere hit the protagonist to relief the tension from the drama).
A lot of the shounen manga I have read always has the heroine as the tsundere and she always ends up with the main protagonist Naruto to me is no exception Kishi is just following the usual main hero/heroine pairing and with the usual shounen pairing plot.
#1696
Posted 13 October 2010 - 04:19 AM

"They don't want none"
#1697
Posted 13 October 2010 - 05:33 AM
Quite a few other couple, have not even gotten a fraction of the character development Naruto and Sakura have gotten. Furthermore rarely does a relationship like these two have have the dramatic steps the author has taken to grow them through both trouble and good times.
The development is balanced, growing consistently in both tough times and good times, and always growing together or not too long after one grows does the other have a moment of growth and always in conjunction between the two.
..(^)> PENGUIN!!!!
C(...)D
..m.m
Training with a sannin 2 1/2 years
new pair of gloves 20 ryou
the look on your best friend, and former sensei's face's when you cause a small earth quake. Princeless
Catsis Fan Fiction
#1698
Posted 13 October 2010 - 07:18 AM
#1699
Posted 13 October 2010 - 08:25 AM
The Naruto wiki is completely unreliable. It's so inaccurate on just about any subject that it's laughable. For example the entry for Shikaku Nara for example, has had this hysterically wrong gem for years: "Shikaku, like his son, dislikes strong women."
It's worse than worthless as a source of information, because it's so filled with misinformation that confuses readers. It's so awful that I'd love for Shonen Jump to tell them they are violating copyright and shut them down.
When you go to war, both sides lose totally- Yoko Ono
Remember, our hearts are one. Even when we are at war with each other, our hearts are always beating in unison- Yoko Ono 2009
#1700
Posted 13 October 2010 - 08:57 AM
It's worse than worthless as a source of information, because it's so filled with misinformation that confuses readers. It's so awful that I'd love for Shonen Jump to tell them they are violating copyright and shut them down.
I agree Naruto wiki is very unreleable like Cloud anyone with a IP address can edit the information making it sound like it goes with his/her ideas it doesn't necessary mean that the moderators of the site are that incorrect. But I think it's a little extreme that SJ shut them down however I also agree about the wrong information confusing the reader.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users


This topic is locked











