You know, this is a response I truly get tired of. Whenever Sakura is criticized in any way, many of her fans are willing to hold up the Tsundere argument. And when someone says that they do not like the Tsundere archetype, that person gets accused of not knowing what a Tsundere is. I know exactly what a Tsundere is. But to satisfy and address this accusation once and for all, let's break it down, shall we?
Tsundere:
"a Japanese character development process that describes a person who is initially cold and even hostile towards another person before gradually showing their warm side over time."
"The Japanese term tsundere refers to a character who "runs hot and cold", alternating between two distinct moods: tsuntsun (aloof or irritable) and deredere (lovestruck)."
"a word to describe the nature of female anime or game characters. Tsundere is a word combining two words, "Tsun Tsun" and "Dere Dere". Both terms describe attitudes of a person. "Tsun Tsun" is used for cold/blunt/curt attitude, while "Dere Dere" is used when a person becomes spoony in front of his/her lover."
Now, cross referencing these definitions, the important characteristic to note is the shifting personality or unstable demeanor, swaying from hot-tempered and hostile or irritable (TsunTsun) to love-struck, caring, or otherwise affectionate in some fashion (DereDere).
Given that this is often in relation to the hero of the story, her dismissive, angry, irritable disposition toward Naruto (including the "comical" violence) is eventually counterbalanced by her growing affection for him down the line.
I am fully aware of what a Tsundere is, among all of the other archetypes and their examples. Though it is only a small factor of her Tsundere nature, her hitting him is included. I accept that and I do not take issue with it. Here are my concerns:
1) Her violence toward him is often dismissed as comical, not to be taken seriously. But that's exactly the problem. Why is it funny? Why should I laugh? Why is this behavior acceptable? I don't care that it's because it fits in with the Tsundere archetype if used properly. Why is this behavior acceptable at all, from anyone, regardless of their archetype?
2) You're basically telling fans who dislike her early actions to accept them, or even like them, because she is a Tsundere. So what? Why does this justify anything? Characters are created on these archetypes precisely because they are meant to evoke an emotional response of some kind from the audience. But as soon as someone does not like the character type, they're told not to be upset because this is what she is supposed to do based on her definition.
This is absurd. If you're arguing why she should be liked from a character standpoint, then you should do so from the context and content of her character instead of the mechanical processes used to create her.
By that logic, no one should be upset by Sasuke abandoning the Leaf and stomping on Sakura's heart, because his roles trade off between Antihero/Villain.
No one should be upset with Orochimaru killing the Third or causing so much emotional strain between our main characters, because he is a Villan and a Threshold Guardian.
No one should be upset by Kabuto's constant betrayals and back stabbing behavior, because he is a Shapeshifter.
You wouldn't accept this for any of the other characters, would you? And it's because you're judging their behaviors based on their content of character and the context of their actions. You're not reasoning it based on what Kishimoto intended their role to be, because you understand that it's a matter of why, not what.
I know what Sakura is. I know how she is a Tsundere, and I know why. But I repeat, who cares? Why does it matter? What she does and why she does it based on the specifics of her character and the context is more important than the wireframe definition of her character type. It does not excuse or justify anything.
"Don't get upset. I was supposed to stuff this little nerd into his locker. I am a no-neck jock/high school bully. I'm supposed to do that." Would you accept this? Then why would you accept it in Sakura's case?
If you're going to defend her actions, then do so based on who she was and how she grew to because who she is. Do so based on the plot points of the story, justification and redemption, not on the skeletal guidelines of her character.
QUOTE
The answer is simple. It must NOT be taken seriously. We are not supposed to.
When violence must be taken seriously in one story, then? The answer is likewise simple. You have to look to the context and the mood of the setting. When Sasuke nearly killed Naruto, Naruto spent several days in the hospital. It was not forgotten in the next panel. It was not treated like if it was nothing.
QUOTE
Please, forgive me for being frank, but... you are mixing your real life experiences with the happenings of a fictional story, and using the former for judging the later. And that is never good.
QUOTE
He has never expressed he minds it, whereas he has very clearly and repeatedly stated he hated being ignored like if he did not exist, so... No, he does not mind.
I don't understand how you don't see why I take issue with this. Why is the violence supposed to be funny? Why does the context make it funny? Would you find it funny if it was a girl getting punched, even if it was the same context? Of course Naruto doesn't mind. He doesn't exist. Kishimoto doesn't mind him being hurt for the sake of humor.
The context is comical, not serious, so I'm sure this man getting hit by the car doesn't mind, either:
Hilarious, right?I'm sure this guy has no problem at all getting ruthlessly assaulted for no reason at all. I mean, it's comedy. It's all in good fun, right?:
Ha ha ha! That'll teach him to...uh...not ask for directions?Why is this funny? Can you please tell me? Because I don't see a reason. And I don't see a reason to call Sakura's violence against Naruto funny, either. "He got punched in the face. Ha ha ha. He tried to hug her. He deserved it. She's a Tsundere after all."
I know what a Tsundere is. I know it quite well. I just don't like it. I know violence doesn't have to be part of the definition, but it's often associated, and I especially don't like that fact.
Edited by PachucoDesigns, 25 March 2012 - 08:49 PM.
On the morning of Wednesday, April 11th, 2012, my Aunt Karla passed away. She was my mother's baby sister, and my coolest aunt when I was a kid. She was the best babysitter ever, and she was like an older sister to me.
Karly, I don't know if you can hear this. I am not a believer, I haven't been since Sheryl died. But if you can, I want you to know that I'm truly sorry for everything bad I've ever said about you. When you were suffering, I should have been there to help you. I should have visited. I should have encouraged you to leave the house and get a job, to be active and alive the way you used to be.
I promise that I will do everything that I can to be successful and a good person, to make you proud the way you would have wanted me to. No matter what I said, I loved you. And I will always love you. Rest in Peace, you will never be forgotten.