Yeah sorry, I get a bit worked up whenever I'm reminded of what happened, shouldn't have directed my rage towards you.
Still...Sakura did practically nothing useful during the entire fight(s). And Kishimoto wonders why people call her a bad heroine...
Exactly. Also, here's a good assessment of a protagonist's role (particularly females)
QUOTE
Protagonism, simply protagonism.
Whereas Lucy doesn't appear by far to be the strongest mage in the series, she is by far the most important because she is the heroine of the show.
In Bleach Rukia is a second tier fighter but she is given far more importance than Unohana, Yoruichi or any other strong women because Rukia is the girl who met Ichigo and caused the adventure to start.
Whereas I think Kubo forces Rukia to play important roles, I think Mashima gives ample room for Lucy's growth which is tied to the far reaching plot.
He already did that amazingly in Rave Master, so the mistery and weirdness magnet behind the main female protagonist is one of his fortes.
The above example shows the female protagonists' roles in their respective stories, and what the poster points out is that both females each have an impact in an
active manner in their stories, and subsequently, the hero.
I'll ask this question again to everyone, does both girls (Hinata and Sakura) have an impact on the story, and subsequently, the hero?? The answer is
no. If you deem their roles as pairing fodder to be impacting to the story, I'm gonna say
HELL NO. A role like that is a
passive role. This is what people here seem to mix up romantic fodder with
active instead of
passive.However, 615 seems to have grown Hinata out of that passive role. Whether she'll remain in an active role remains to be seen. Sakura?? still passive as ever since Part I. Gaara arc was the one moment where she took an active role in affecting the story, but Kishi screwed up the consistency and never followed up again.