Please dont get me started on Florida. We have crook for a govenor. Im sorry but you dont plead the Fifth 75 times in a deposition unless your sure you're gonna go to jail.
Hes a corporate politician and running the place like a ceo. and considering the last time he was ceo he was responsible for the largest medicair fraud in history and the largest fine as well. I cant wait to hear that hes raiding peoples pension plans becuase of an "" economic emergency""
Also hes cut 1.75 billion in education from k-12, supposedly to balance the budget. unfortunately he replaced it with 1.82 billion in tax breaks for corporations. So in effect he made the defecit worse.
Add in that hes put on hold the Suntrans project and denied the federaly funded high speed rail line both of which were approved by the state legislature, and ready to go, and both of which would have created numerous jobs.
Edit update:
A new poll shows that Scott is worse then we thought. How bad you ask?
A new poll shows that if the election were held today Scott would lose to democratic challenger Alex Sink by 19 points 37% to 56%
Hes not the only one. Walker would lose to his democratic challenger 47-52, and kasich would lose by 13 points.
Don't get me wrong. I'm a state employee and I have the same contempt for him that he has for us. But at least he doesn't have the Republican legislature acting like his lapdog. Instead, they complain when he breaks laws such as selling the state plane and using the money for his pet projects instead of following the budget set by the legislature. He seems to think that state revenues are his kitty.
I may have spoken a bit too soon about the Florida legislature's respect for the constitution. In addition to the ridiculous ideas such as putting golf courses in state parks when about 300 golf courses have closed in Florida over the last couple years and existing golf courses are still hurting for customers (thankfully withdrawn) or the bill to prevent local governments from passing gun control laws, making the politicians that enact regulations subject to harsh fines (might be unconstitutional, but who would want to risk it?), they want to
restrict the court's ability to regulate amendments.
The Florida Legislature has complained in the past about the ease of the constitutional amendment process in Florida, claiming that it binds their hands. They are also the biggest proponent of amendments, submitting six to be on the ballot just last year. However, 3 of their 6 got knocked off by the courts due to vague and misleading language and 4 of the last 5 of theirs that have been challenged.
As a voter who has frequently faced amendments, I assure you that the amendments are confusing (and not just theirs). It doesn't even have to be deliberate, but trying to summarize an amendment into a title and short paragraph is tough. Legislators can get around that in bills by giving them whatever misleading name that they want because the legislators are supposed to take the time to actually read them - or at least have their staffs do it. But when they have a paragraph that talks about property tax reform (removing residency requirements, introducing portability in two forms and raising the homestead exemption) or concurrency laws, I'm stumped and I'm only confident about the ones that I've researched before the election. They do give you a sample ballot for that, but the ballot itself isn't helpful. And these are the ones that the court
has allowed.
The bigger issue is that the legislature wants to pass a law to restrict judicial authority. Wouldn't that require a constitutional amendment?
Government shutdown has once again arrived. Who will come out unscathed this time? Democrats, or will the Republicans lose again like they did with the last major government shutdown. Somehow, I think both parties are going to take the brunt of the blame this time around:
http://news.yahoo.co...cm_csm/374778_1I agree. I still don't understand why the Democrats couldn't or wouldn't get it passed in the lame duck session or even before the election. It's also weird that they've apparently settled on a dollar figure, but not the exact cuts. If it's about specific programs, then the dollar figure should be immaterial. The specific figure is more central for deficit reduction. I'll be a
bit charitable and assume that maybe the Democrats say that there are X programs that absolutely can't be cut, but they'll cut $33M of them anyway.
It's also kinda funny that the dollar figure is the original one that Boehner had proposed before the Tea Partiers rebelled on him.