Sigh. No, Kishimoto didn't say Sakura's love was changing. I know that's how we took it, but Viz's translation was more correct. It wasn't a crush anymore, it was 'selfless love'. That's why Kakashi says she wasn't confessing to make him hers, she wanted to save him. Also, again, Sasuke specifically said he was making people hate him to push them away. Him saying he didn't care about Sakura was an act. The second he turns good, what does he do? Apologizes to her. What happens the second Sasuke turns good and comes back? Sakura jumps on him and asks to go with him, even though that would mean leaving Naruto behind. She never loved Naruto. And Sasuke was always going to turn around and end up with Sakura. It's a manga about people being redeemed with words, and he was a main character. He wasn't going to up and die/disappear. Karin was also so unimportant to his story that she also vanishes along with Taka.
I'm sorry, but yes, a lot of the people in our fandom read way too much into Naruto. It was never complex, it was never a story about romance with ninjas on the side, it was never intricately plotted as such either. This is in his own words, he didn't put much romance in at all. He couldn't have been more blunt about this. And the proof is right there-SS/NH are canon. Kishimoto chose the most canon movie to be about Naruto falling in love with Hinata. Narusaku was a happy accident, but it's never going to end up canon;. That ship sailed a long, long time ago. From the moment they started working on that movie, NS was dead canon wise.
...You do realize Romeo and Juliet was a play mocking young love, right? And to compare a mangaka to Shakespeare...Did you guys think Naruto was high literature? They're ninjas who throw fire balls and magic lightning at each other. I get being disappointed, but I'm starting to think you thought Naruto was something it never was...I mean jeeze, that "romantic" scene on the bench ends with Naruto having the runs....You can't fathom why a 'good writer' would go against the 'literary rules' and not write Narusaku. There is your answer. Under your terms, Kishimoto isn't a good writer. He recently said he was like Naruto, because no one thought he'd ever be a mangaka. He didn't start writing Naruto until he took a college course in script writing. That's his background.
http://www.saiyanisl...otos-childhood/
That's the point, it ain't high litterature. It's storytelling 101 lol. Main character got a love interest. Love interest love rival and hate main character. Main character has to win over the love interest while beating the rival. Rival giving the win in the fight to the main character, still get the girl while the the said love interest just regress to her 12 yeas old self. Main character never confess in the story his feeling. Plus the 1 million foreshadow and the never gives up attitude of the main character.
We never see him get any of his dream. Rival get a pardon that easily ( when he tried litteraly to take over the world, kill the 5 kage (1 like a mother to both the other main character)
He hook up with a girl who he barely interact in the manga.
In other word and to put it simply, it is bad writting. Action should have shown Sasuke hesitate toward Sakura. Naruto should have been shown moving from Sakura to Hinata. Sakura should have been shown clearly loving Sasuke as a lover, not like family (693, it's team 7 bonds as family. Kakashi could have said that this girl pour her heart out for you, when he said not romantically, it's misleading) Never shown the random guy love letter or Sakura doesn't trust Sasuke. Don't parallel Sakura to Karin during life their saving attempt while Hinata trip. Don't make Naruto dad said : You take care of my son ( after the parallel with Kushina and the girlfriend question).
You don't have to look too deep to see that something went wrong. Either it's bad writting or selling out. Well anyway, we will know like 10 years later, when we won't care anymore.