-Yeah, do this
-Your opinion, then again I found it okay
-I didn't really thought it was wasting time, and you really didn't managed to learn what Shirou answer was.
Shirou acknowledges that his ideal is an impossible one from the beginning but at the same time he is peeved by it and doesn't want to give up because he believes in the end he would be able to do it.
Archer shows him the result of this path,because blindly following his ideals even in his after life, Archer ended up as just as a another killer. Shirou acknowledges this, he acknowledges that he won't ever be able to uphold this ideals completely, they are after all an utopia, however he won't stop following them, not because he is "the protagonist!" or something like that, but it's because it's a beautiful wish he inherited from his father, in short UBW Shirou will never regret his actions doen while upholding these ideals because for him the value is on the journey and not on the destination
Seriously this is pretty clear by the end of episode 20 and near the end of their fight in episode 21
How people chalk it up to just some dumb shonen junk of "being protagonist" makes no sense
- It is irrelevant because the character in question is Gil, and Gil is like that.
If the scene had no build up in the end because the author chose to follow Gil's character, what of it? At least he is not OOC
As I already repeated before, if Gil is a servant that had the power to end the 4th war in one day and yet didn't do it so, so ill you call this "bad execution" too? It's just his character.
He is plainly convinced that there is nothing that those "maggots" can do to stop his plans and he has the power to back it up
- I want to go back and transcribe the exact lines of dialogue they used to better support my point, but that'd take way too long, and I admit I'm too lazy to do it. So I guess I'll drop this part for now.
- "Shirou acknowledges that his ideal is an impossible one from the beginning but at the same time he is peeved by it and doesn't want to give up because he believes in the end he would be able to do it."
I got that. Problem is, Archer is standing right there proving him wrong. Proving that he wouldn't be able to do it. He is staring at physical evidence. Yes, you address this in the next quote I cite, but I wanted to do this step-by-step.
"Shirou acknowledges this, he acknowledges that he won't ever be able to uphold this ideals completely, they are after all an utopia, however he won't stop following them, not because he is "the protagonist!" or something like that, but it's because it's a beautiful wish he inherited from his father, in short UBW Shirou will never regret his actions doen while upholding these ideals because for him the value is on the journey and not on the destination"
So the moral here is to follow your dreams and give into childish naivete, even if it only ends up making things worse, because... the current you thinks it's a nice idea, and enjoying the journey is more important than the destructive destination? To ignore criticism? To keep believing in what you believe in, even if you've basically been proven 100% wrong?
I reiterate: that's just plain stupid. People chalk it up to dumb shounen junk because that's exactly how it comes across. Hell, it might even come across worse by explicitly saying with its message to ignore criticism, even if it's right.
- Quality characters =/= quality scenes. You can keep the character the same and the events the same as long as it flows naturally and well. This scene didn't. A scene making sense from a character standpoint does not justify sloppiness.
It wasn't bad execution when he didn't end the 4th grail war immediately because there were several mitigating factors, such as the fact that he was restrained by two separate masters and a general plan. Fate/Zero also did a great job of justifying logical inconsistencies with character flaws/traits (minus one or two bizarre instances).
This, on the other hand, called a ton of attention to him being able to end this in one fell swoop and had little to no convincing mitigating factors present to prevent him from doing so. Maybe it made sense for his character to walk out for such a trivial reason, but the way it was handled felt cheap. An easy alteration to the scene which would have fixed this would be to have him not take out Gate of Babylon at all. Have him talking with them, then show the ash/dirt/soot/whatever it was fall from above, then have him say "you know what, you can't stop me even if you try, so I'm not going to even bother considering killing you; you aren't worth getting dirty over" (obviously not word-for-word) and leave. There. Problem solved. Simple fix. The fight isn't built up too much and it flows a lot more naturally instead of ending abruptly and coming across as a cheap way to let our main characters limp out of there alive. Done. Don't have him consider them a threat by taking out Gate of Babylon, and then suddenly change his mind.
Ilya and Kirie is mostly the Fate and HF route because they are trying give characters certain importants like here is Caster, Assassin and Shinji (only route where you see him up to the end) and Fate Zero is meant to seen after, it assumes you have some knowledge of the Fate series and other type moon works because they are connected in some ways (plus characters shows up like Cornelius did in FZ)
Ps. Watch Kara no Kyoukai (
)
Funnily enough though, Fate/Zero requires viewers to have less prior knowledge going in than F/SN UBW does. Fate/Zero makes sense on its own as a standalone, while UBW doesn't. That makes this whole mess even more problematic.
Kara no Kyoukai is on my to-watch list.
Edited by CloudMountainJuror, 31 May 2015 - 10:05 PM.