12649 replies to this topic

[Shadow1275]

Oh, I see how it is. I leave and it gets serious in here.

[trang95]

Ich werde generell keine mangas mehr lesen oder animes schauen. Das hat mir gereicht...

Viel Glueck damit. Dat koennt ich persoehnlich nie und nimmer machen.

[Gaara's hair]

[Gaara's hair]

557 pages...you guys talk a lot.

[DeathGodMack]

[Nar123]

http://sailorharuno....s-fan-for-seven

[Rabbit]

The world is a cruel place. 

[trang95]

http://sailorharuno....s-fan-for-seven

For a moment I thought that tumblr blogger was you, lol.

That user is just one example of how many people looked up to Sakura.

[Gaara's hair]

http://sailorharuno....s-fan-for-seven

[Tsuki Hoshino]

Excuse me but I'll have you know that I work very hard to provide those tweets. Sometimes there are so many complaining about the ending that its hard to choose.

 

Mangakas are going to re-write the ending??? Has Kishi commented on that at all? 

This is actually pretty common among Japanese media. There are lots of Fan Comics called Doujinshi--its a bit like our Fanfics and Fanarts only that they can make money off it without being sued into wearing a barrel. It wouldn't be out of the ordinary for it to be done for Naruto by any means. I suppose what would be strange would be that other POPULAR Mangaka would partake in it. 

[Shadow1275]

This is actually pretty common among Japanese media. There are lots of Fan Comics called Doujinshi--its a bit like our Fanfics and Fanarts only that they can make money off it without being sued into wearing a barrel. It wouldn't be out of the ordinary for it to be done for Naruto by any means. I suppose what would be strange would be that other POPULAR Mangaka would partake in it. 

I know about fan Doujinshi but what about copyright? Woudn't that prevent aney moneymaking? 

[Tsuki Hoshino]

I know about fan Doujinshi but what about copyright? Woudn't that prevent aney moneymaking? 

The laws are different there than here; Despite being in direct conflict with the Japanese copyright law as many dōjinshi are derivative works and dōjinshi artists rarely secure the permission of the original creator, Comiket is still permitted to be held twice a year and holds over half-a-million people attending each time it convenes.^[14] However, the practice of dōjinshi can be beneficial to the commercial manga market by creating an avenue for aspiring manga artists to practice,^[15] and talented dōjinshi creators are contacted by publishers.^[16] This practice has existed since the 1980s.^[17] Salil Mehra, a law professor at Temple University, hypothesizes that because dōjinshi market actually causes the manga market to be more productive, the law does not ban dōjinshi as the industry would suffer as a result.^[15]

There are two notable instances of legal action over dōjinshi. In 1999, the author of an erotic Pokemon manga was prosecuted by Nintendo. This created a media furor as well as an academic analysis in Japan of the copyright issues around dōjinshi. At this time, the legal analysis seemed to conclude that dōjinshi should be overlooked because they are produced by amateurs for one-day events and not sold in the commercial market.^[18] In 2006, an artist selling an imagined "final chapter" for the series Doraemon, which was never completed, was given a warning by the estate of author Fujiko F. Fujio. His creation apparently looked confusingly similar to a real Doraemon manga. He ceased distribution of his dōjinshi and sent compensation to the publisher voluntarily. The publisher noted at this time that dōjinshi were not usually a cause of concern for him. The Yomiuri Shinbunnoted, "Fanzines don't usually cause many problems as long as they are sold only at one-day exhibitions," but quoted an expert saying that due to their increasing popularity a copyright system should be set up.<sup>[19]

So technically, yes sueing could occur but it usually doesn't. They see it more as free publicity then anything else.</sup> 

[Gaara's hair]

The laws are different there than here; Despite being in direct conflict with the Japanese copyright law as many dōjinshi are derivative works and dōjinshi artists rarely secure the permission of the original creator, Comiket is still permitted to be held twice a year and holds over half-a-million people attending each time it convenes.^[14] However, the practice of dōjinshi can be beneficial to the commercial manga market by creating an avenue for aspiring manga artists to practice,^[15] and talented dōjinshi creators are contacted by publishers.^[16] This practice has existed since the 1980s.^[17] Salil Mehra, a law professor at Temple University, hypothesizes that because dōjinshi market actually causes the manga market to be more productive, the law does not ban dōjinshi as the industry would suffer as a result.^[15]

There are two notable instances of legal action over dōjinshi. In 1999, the author of an erotic Pokemon manga was prosecuted by Nintendo. This created a media furor as well as an academic analysis in Japan of the copyright issues around dōjinshi. At this time, the legal analysis seemed to conclude that dōjinshi should be overlooked because they are produced by amateurs for one-day events and not sold in the commercial market.^[18] In 2006, an artist selling an imagined "final chapter" for the series Doraemon, which was never completed, was given a warning by the estate of author Fujiko F. Fujio. His creation apparently looked confusingly similar to a real Doraemon manga. He ceased distribution of his dōjinshi and sent compensation to the publisher voluntarily. The publisher noted at this time that dōjinshi were not usually a cause of concern for him. The Yomiuri Shinbunnoted, "Fanzines don't usually cause many problems as long as they are sold only at one-day exhibitions," but quoted an expert saying that due to their increasing popularity a copyright system should be set up.<sup>[19]

So technically, yes sueing could occur but it usually doesn't. They see it more as free publicity then anything else.</sup> 

Thanks for the info, Tsuki  I learn something everyday.

[Shadow1275]

The laws are different there than here; Despite being in direct conflict with the Japanese copyright law as many dōjinshi are derivative works and dōjinshi artists rarely secure the permission of the original creator, Comiket is still permitted to be held twice a year and holds over half-a-million people attending each time it convenes.^[14] However, the practice of dōjinshi can be beneficial to the commercial manga market by creating an avenue for aspiring manga artists to practice,^[15] and talented dōjinshi creators are contacted by publishers.^[16] This practice has existed since the 1980s.^[17] Salil Mehra, a law professor at Temple University, hypothesizes that because dōjinshi market actually causes the manga market to be more productive, the law does not ban dōjinshi as the industry would suffer as a result.^[15]

There are two notable instances of legal action over dōjinshi. In 1999, the author of an erotic Pokemon manga was prosecuted by Nintendo. This created a media furor as well as an academic analysis in Japan of the copyright issues around dōjinshi. At this time, the legal analysis seemed to conclude that dōjinshi should be overlooked because they are produced by amateurs for one-day events and not sold in the commercial market.^[18] In 2006, an artist selling an imagined "final chapter" for the series Doraemon, which was never completed, was given a warning by the estate of author Fujiko F. Fujio. His creation apparently looked confusingly similar to a real Doraemon manga. He ceased distribution of his dōjinshi and sent compensation to the publisher voluntarily. The publisher noted at this time that dōjinshi were not usually a cause of concern for him. The Yomiuri Shinbunnoted, "Fanzines don't usually cause many problems as long as they are sold only at one-day exhibitions," but quoted an expert saying that due to their increasing popularity a copyright system should be set up.<sup>[19]

So technically, yes sueing could occur but it usually doesn't. They see it more as free publicity then anything else.</sup> 

[Tsuki Hoshino]

Thanks for the info, Tsuki  I learn something everyday.

That's what I'm here for That and to be ungodly amusing. 

[trang95]

Thanks for the info, Tsuki  I learn something everyday.

*ahem* Italian cuss words *ahem*

[Gaara's hair]

That's what I'm here for That and to be ungodly amusing. 

Yes, where did you get these ungodly powers?

 

*ahem* Italian cuss words *ahem*

Ahem, yes I should thank Lady tomorrow 

[TouKen4Life3g]

I still can't believe abuse is acceptable.

[Tsuki Hoshino]

Yes, where did you get these ungodly powers?

 

Ahem, yes I should thank Lady tomorrow 

My mama and Daddy. 

They were the Demi-gods of amusing.   
 

I still can't believe abuse is acceptable.

Oh no, Its only acceptable in FICTION Big difference, Amirite?

At least that's what  Sasusaku fans will tell you. "Its a story! its not like in real life!" 

Edited by Tsuki Hoshino, 14 November 2014 - 02:12 AM.

[Nar123]

For a moment I thought that tumblr blogger was you, lol.

That user is just one example of how many people looked up to Sakura.

 

no no hahaha I'm not a girl  

Edited by Nar123, 14 November 2014 - 02:12 AM.