Also, while I understand why many don't want to start a Sakura vs Hinata debate (and I do agree with that to a large extent), I can't help but notice that in some ways Hinata is set up as a foil to Sakura. Sakura is the normal girl with an irrelevant clan/family while Hinata is from a major clan, Sakura has neither a Kekkei Genkai nor any known secret clan techniques, Hinata has a Kekkei Genkai and the secret clan techniques and abilities that come with it (and the clan is so secretive and protective of their techniques that they place a seal on less important clan members), Sakura is the hero's love interest, the hero is Hinata's love interest, Sakura is at first oblivious to Naruto's pain but becomes the person who seems to understand him the most (yes, even more than Sasuke who has an instinctive understand of Naruto to some degree, but doesn't understand him yet --it's why he asks why back during the Team 7 reunion), Hinata's the first of the R9/K11 to notice Naruto's suffering but has a complete misunderstanding of what the actual source of his suffering was/is, Sakura is the person inspired by Naruto to actively work to find her inner strength (demonstrated in the most unsubtle manner during her battle with Ino), while Hinata is the person most inspired by Naruto's nindo but who is still unable to use it to play to her strengths and thus more often than not tends to fall short, and of course most recently Sakura's goal has been to get everyone (not just herself) to be of some use to Naruto, while Hinata has been focused on reaching Naruto (and yes helping...I'm not trying to pain Hinata as the evil of all evils, she certainly not evil at all, in any way) Naruto so that she can gain some recognition from him (get something from him). Maybe I'm reading into it too much, maybe I'm giving Kishi too much credit, but it does seem particularly methodical to me. I don't quite understand what Kishi's purpose is, I think at some point he'll let her realize that she has her own inner strength and that she'll be inspired to focus on her clan etc etc, but I do think his writing lends itself to the comparison between Sakura and Hinata, and that Hinata isn't underdeveloped, but a character who has some sort of self-inflicted co-dependency with a dose of development-limiting tunnel vision (when it comes to Naruto, but mainly in terms of her own self-assessment).
I agree with this part so much. I've often thought Sakura and Hinata were a foil to each other, and maybe that's why we end up comparing the two so much (even unconsciously). Sakura started out similarly to Hinata. She was a shy, unconfident girl who often felt victimized and needed inspiration from another to change (Ino was everything Sakura wanted to be, while Naruto was everything Hinata wanted to be). The reason why Sakura turned out so different than Hinata was because her source of inspiration sought her out, while Hinata never had things that easy. And despite their drastic personality differences by now, Sakura and Hinata do have three things in common. They go through spells of self-doubt and sense of uselessness, always wanted to be someone important and acknowledged, and of course, the core of their characters is driven by their different bonds with Naruto.
However, that is where the similarities end. Sakura outgrew her shyness and became someone bold, active, and confident (mostly). She is almost everything Hinata is not, and that even reflects in their shared love for Naruto.
Yet, I disagree Kishi was intending to make Hinata look bad. I don't think he was trying to make her look great either, but definitely not horrible. I just think he is failing to do anything right with her character now, but not by lack of trying.
Edited by xxRomanceGirlxx, 09 October 2013 - 07:28 AM.