I know this is a bit off topic, but do obito and madara have different moon eye plans? Because if obito is going to betray madara, can't Naruto sense it with his jinchuricki form?
I think Naruto can only read evil intent, not mind read people. It's like sensing the aura around a person even when you cant read their minds, you know they are evil or up to no good.
I completely agree that Danzo has just become a crutch to the story. He's the one the audience is allowed to freely hate, piling on his crimes after the fact. Itachi is just as much a ends-justifies-the-means character, but he is treated like a moral compass.
It's frustrating because there are horrific aspects to this manga: swapping eyeballls; mass genocide; parent's attempting to kill children; attempt to kill a newborn; gutting said baby's parents; and having "siblings" (Sai and his brother) and lovers (Yahiko and Nagato) have to make a choice to kill their partner and ultimately witnessing one sacrifice themselves to save the other.
These are horrific situations Kishimoto subjects the main characters to. So why does he take a softer hand with the villains? Why does he build them up to be true villains, with their choices only goverened by their soul whim...then tell us about their weepy backstory and how they have this longstanding goal that people can understand.
Like I said, I could maybe see it if Obito was so pissed he wanted to wipe out the world because of Rin's death. But not a genjutsu of zombie peace. Same for Madara. I'm dreading a backstory where he got kicked in the shins as a kid and not he wants to rule everything.
I just don't see these villains as being "realistic." I see it as Kishimoto not being comfortable with the audience hating a character. So he gives us one to hate (Danzo) and the rest we are forced to understand.
But instead of making Naruto wrestle with the tough real-life issues — does the end really justify the means, how do you forgive when the opponent is not sorry, how do you move on if you don't seek revenge for the crushing hand life has dealt you — he makes the villains a little less villainous. Naruto just swoops in as the hero, skirting these realistic issues.
Me and Nate have been in a real long discussion about this. I am sure you members have seen and we have come to a conclusion that why most of the major villains in this story have such a complicated and weepy past is because if they didn't and Naruto forgave them, then it would undermine Naruto's character and his ideas that hatred can be ended. How can you forgive pure evil without seeming stupid or gullible? I argued that that is what make Heroes who they are and how the fact that chances are they know this.
That's the biggest problem I have seen with this manga myself. The whole "end the circle of hatred" has become such a problem in not letting villains push beyond boundaries of what they are able to do. If that subject line wasn't in the equation, then most of these villains might possibly be far worse. I don't think it is because Kishi is scared or incapable but if he did he would break his own logic.
Personally, because of this fact, is the reason why I hate this "end the circle of hatred." It's such a strange logic that kind of defeats the purpose of everything. If people didn't hate each other than what is the point of training ninja? It is a circular logic that without it the universe wouldn't exist. In reality, you can't do it because for one reason or another people will hate each other over something. People blame religion or cultural backgrounds, but in all honestly if it wasn't that then it would be something else. It could even be over something stupid like the Dr Seuss book of where you put the butter on the toast.
It's not to say humans are not incapable of loving each other, but just saying everyone will always disagree on one thing or another and if that disagreement is strong enough then a war could break out.
Edited by James S Cassidy, 26 September 2012 - 10:28 PM.