What I like to do is push to question even the very validity of "the opponent's" argument, to see if their premise even holds water. If the premise doesn't hold, arguments build on it don't either. Maybe this comes across very aggressive? Though it has also been my experience that sometimes merely disagreeing is seen as hostile. You can see this behaviour in the ch 615 thread where just mere sentiments expressing that NH might now happen got many angry and rude responses.
If NS becomes canon, of course I'll admit that I was wrong to believe in NH and SS canon. Why on earth I wouldn't?
Edit. So if NH becomes canon, will I hear you admitting that you were wrong? Or will I hear some more how Kishi is a bad storyteller and totally originally intended to make NS but just got money-hungry and went capitalist?
Edited by Poison_In_Your_Coffee, 03 January 2013 - 06:24 PM.


This topic is locked



















