wtf are you doing?
Its wasn't Nakamura, it was someone else from the anime team who asked the question. and stop trying to make kitten up. Chie Nakamura NEVER said she was a SS shipper. in her Interview a couple months back when shes was answering fans questions, she made it obvous that pairing annoys her and wanted Sakura to move on, she even said she couldn't see them married. afterwards she was very vague about NS so she basically prefered are pairing. end of.
Graven isn't "making kitten up", it's just that word's been going around about the interview for ages now that Chie Nakamura is apparently an SS shipper. Now, we don't know if this is exactly true since some translations where she says so can be biased and translated for the benefit of opposing fandoms. And how do you know it was someone from the anime team who asked the question instead? Also, what interview did Chie Nakamura say that pairings annoy her?
The worst thing about NH claiming the N/S hug was a platonic bro/sis moment is that there's a picture floating around of Hinata giving the hug instead. Why is it romantic with her and not Sakura? I think they know that it was a romantic moment and just don't want to admit it.
Uggghh I know right? The same thing is with SS. Although a little less popular, people draw
Sasuke in place of Naruto so Sakura is hugging Sasuke instead. And the worst part is that sometimes people draw Naruto in the
background being happy for the two. I know it shouldn't, but it pisses me off to no end to be honest.
QUOTE
As for the second bold point, that is so true! One look through an Anti-NaruSaku forum told me that. Apparently every interaction they've had is platonic. Every. Interaction. It's like they refuse to acknowledge that it can be interpreted both ways. I stopped looking when they started saying that if Kishi makes NaruSaku happen it will be an 'asspull' that 'completely contradicts the manga' and he's a 'bad writer'

.
LOLWUT.
Kishi-sensei making NS canon would be an asspull that completely contradicts the manga and he's a bad writer? B#tch please.
How the hell will NS being canon contradict the manga?! I shall correct this wrong statement.
QUOTE
If Kishi makes NaruHina happen it will be an 'asspull' that 'completely contradicts the manga' and he's a 'bad writer'.
Now
that, my friends, is correct. There's so much, if not
too much evidence that NS is most likely to happen in the conclusion of the manga. For Kishi-sensei to pull off the biggest LOLYOUGOTTROLLED no jutsu by making NH canon in the end... now that's just pure laziness there. And
then he would be a bad writer. I won't exactly put it as being an asspull if NH became canon, but seriously, to make a pairing that has pretty much 0% development within almost 570 chapters canon, that really is bad writing, and
that would seriously contradict the manga. Kishi-sensei, I will admit, has the power to do that, however I think we can trust him
not to pull of an action like that. And he himself, as the creater of the manga, should know that better than us, the audience.
How you guys think Sakura will react once she learn the truth about Itachi? She will definitely learn about it sooner or later. I keep hearing it will be the key to make sasusaku canon.
As for this, I agree with catsi. It definitely wouldn't make SS canon, however it would be nice if Sakura knew about Itachi and the Uchiha Clan Massacre, since she's the only one in Team 7 being kept in the dark. Therefore if she knew as well, she would definitely understand Sasuke's ways better. But she certainly won't be running up to him again after everything he's done. Instead of following Itachi's way, Sasuke decided to go his own way by destroying Konoha. Even if Sakura understood Sasuke better, she wouldn't be happy with his decisions. Sasuke could have easily followed Itachi, and that would give Sakura a reason to sympathise with him more than she would if she knew the truth, but that is not the case.