@Atheck
You're writing walls of text to justify Sasuke leaving the village as a good moral choice when it's obvious it wasn't. You are overthinking.
Since when was I justifying his actions? Where in my post did I ever make the assertion that his decision was morally just? The only thing that I stated relating to the ethics of his defection was that it was ultimately his choice to abandon everything that he once held dear for a dismal ambition to kill his brother for the sake of avenging his clan. If you believe that a simple comparison of teaching methods between Orochimaru and Kakashi is "overthinking" this situation then I really have no words to say relating to that.
Story wise it is a good choice, but morally it was wrong. That's the point you seem to be missing.
Morality is a subjective concept that is based around one's upbringings and how they view the world. Not that I believe Sasuke's defection was morally righteous but I do acknowledge his actions which at first were not so malevolent in nature aside from the attempted murders of Team 7. Despite my repugnance for his character he wasn't too bad at first when his focus was centred exclusively on killing Itachi; when he was preventing others from being killed and helped to eliminate two Akatsuki members.
If taking into consideration the good Sasuke has done when he was Orosuke is a biased or misguided perspective of the ethics behind his decisions at that then whatever. I'm not concerned with that.
You keep bringing up the fact that he needed to leave in order to kill Itachi, but you're ignoring that Sasuke seeking to kill him by any means necessary is what was viewed as wrong in the first place.
I never stated that he had to leave, only that he would be considerably weaker without Orochimaru's tutelage.
Furthermore, it is fairly obvious that Sasuke has little concern with moral perimeters. He is someone who is willing to assume any approach necessary to acquire power so that he may carry out his personal objectives. Take that from whatever moral angle you would like. But just to clarify something, I personally do not agree with his approach at acquiring this strength but Sasuke is intended to represent the "fallen hero" archetype so it's only natural that his strength would be derived from darkness.
Sasuke was so desperate for power to the point he didn't care if Orochimaru potentially took over his body if it meant that Itachi could die.
And that was the fatal flaw in his logic. Orochimaru was so much more powerful than Sasuke at the time that defeating and acquiring his body would have been a trifle. If he was not in control of his own decisions, if he was but another consciousness engulfed and forced to remain in Orochimaru's artificial realm as a remnant of his body's former personality then the entire purpose behind seeking out Orochimaru would have been defeated.
Sasuke would be forced to rely on Orochimaru's personal desires to kill Itachi for hindering his research if he wanted his revenge to become complete but that would inadvertently jeopardize Konoha's safety which is the single most logical concern that Konoha's leaders should have concerning the defection.
Naruto wasn't gonna let Sasuke sacrifice his life so easily just for the sake of vengeance.
If someone you cared about told you that to achieve what they wanted they don't care if they died in the process, would you simply nod and agree? I hope not. And Naruto sure didn't want to either.
This is perhaps the one sentiment that I agree with Sasuke on. Why should Naruto interfere with Sasuke's personal ambitions? What possible relevance could it have to his life outside of his beloved Team 7 dynamic being changed? No one should be obligated to remain as someone's friend if they do not wish to be. If Sasuke simply chose to retire from his military career in P1 and become a civilian whilst severing all of his ties with Naruto, Sakura, and Kakashi would you believe that Naruto should forcefully recreate that connection and have him be brought back into the group? But then in that scenario who is actually "in the wrong"?
Of course military insurrection is a much more severe circumstance so Naruto would be correct in a particular context to prevent Sasuke from joining Orochimaru. However, preventing someone from making their own decisions in life, even if you may disagree with them, is an action that I am personally opposed to. Talk with them, attempt to make them understand the folly of their actions, but don't try to forcefully designate them to live in the manner in which you want them to.
If you only look at the intentions and objectives without any of the specifics as to how Sasuke reaches his ultimate goal his the desire to avenge his clan really so inherently flawed? Itachi, from his initial mindset, was a murderous betrayer who had delusively ushered Sasuke into believing that he was a compassionate older brother yet in reality he had no conscience for the deaths of his family; attributing his murderous proclivities to wanting to "measure his capacity".
From Sasuke's perspective, there were no redeeming qualities to Itachi. If you look at just the fundamental reasoning and intentions, how is this desire for vengeance any more ethically unjust than Zabuza murdering Gato to avenge Haku or Team 10 decamping from Konoha in order to track down Hidan and kill him? Did anyone ever protest against these people fighting to satisfy their desire for vengeance? I always did wonder why Kakashi was so opposed to Sasuke seeking out Itachi to kill him yet he was complacent with Team 10 committing what basically amounted to dereliction of duty in order to do the exact same thing. Is it because Sasuke's approach was much more extreme? If he remained in Konoha and was acquiring power through a more upright approach then would there be any objections to him wanting to eventually kill Itachi? It isn't as if there is anyone close to Itachi who would react negatively to his death. Kisame was arguably one of his closest companions after defecting and he never sought vengeance against Sasuke. In fact he appeared to be perfectly content with Sasuke forming a temporary alliance with Akatsuki. To almost all of Konoha Itachi was a dangerous missing nin who was acting to further Akatsuki's sinister aims. His death would hold nothing but positive reactions in their eyes and they already were intending to kill him. Regardless of who kills him or for what purpose the end result would be the same.
So the notion that vengeance begets hatred is null and void here.
Edited by Atheck, 15 June 2013 - 08:01 PM.