62735 replies to this topic

[Khaleesi]

LOL  I'm not dismissing anything I'm going by what is shown in character .

 

And I'm saying Kurama is not the talkative guy  he doesn't want disturbance much would rather spend his time sleeping  and they will probably not talk at all  . Talking day to day things !?!?!?!?  OOC as kitten  already LOL. 

 

He wasn't  at  first  and NO Kurama accepted him bc Naruto was different from all the other bc he showed understanding and care for him  and Naruto worked for that and they have a freaking connection .  And no Kurama didn't opened to other Humans were was that ? The overall hate for them is gone maybe but not opening up to them .

 

I keep dismissing it bc its OOC and the whole Kurama talking with her is pure utter kitten  when Hinata was even barely able to talk to Naruto let alone Kurama  . If you are taking this as an OOC fic then they can talk all they want LOL . Its ridiculous to me also how this fic of Kurama talking day to day even started  .

Sighs, you are not understanding anything. I'll do this for you:

1) Again, no one said they would be best friends. I'm talking about them being just "a known person". 

2) You are interpreting "day-to-day things" as "hey, so how was your day" or "what are you going to do next summer" kitten like that. I'm saying that it would be something like "Did you see Naruto?" or a necessary question. Because I really doubt Kuarama would allow a "small talk" with anyone. He won't let people to bond with him.

3) Kurama talking with her is not pure utter kitten. Hinata is Naruto's wife. It's expected. 

Again, not as "best friend", but something necessary.

4) The point of this all is saying that Kurama WON'T HATE her. 

5) All this won't make sense if Kuarama is inside Naruto. Is he?

[Tsuki Hoshino]

AWWWW

Sorry boo  

[DeathGodMack]

I still like NarutoFireFoxUzumaki so don't divorce me!

I heard he took you to the spot were you first meet him to purpose.

[Gaara's hair]

Sorry boo

It's okay Tsuki 

[Atheck]

So you don't find it a little odd that they just boast about revenue?

No, I don't. There is admittedly some level of bias underneath their words, but if the film was experiencing negative financial return, there would have been at least some subtle statement provided to paint the film in a more financially questionable light.
 

These sites only talk about films that flop(as in they don't even pass their costs in revenue). 
But hey I guess we're just going to have to believe in what we want.

You're allowed to purposefully gull yourself if you want, but the numbers and the trend of the films' official reception state otherwise.
 

Lol no
Ramen already told you that he saw way more advertisement with the Last than RtN, so it is true.

Ironically, the Road to Ninja forum here was so much more active before, during, and after the release of the film. But the attribute which drove many to look at RtN was the alternate universe concept and Kishi's involvement with the story. This time it's just an expected gimmick used to prop up the film even more. It doesn't carry the same intrigue.

Oh, and in terms of animation material, RtN had already released so much more footage of the actual movie compared to The Last. But I don't know where or how Ramen got his information from so it's somewhat of a dubious source.
 

Tell me what RtN had and let's see if it was similar to the Last.

Road to Ninja Promotional contents

 
As I said before, the promotional content isn't quite as much like "The Last", but it's still very notable. It doesn't include the cover or additional chapter given to RtN that was inserted into the manga's publications.
 

This isn't just about The Last, it's been said multiple times by multiple members that for a movie considered successful it needs to earn at least twice as it's budget, it's not something that's just specific to The Last.

Actually, they asserted that for a movie to be deemed successful, it needs to earn back triple the investment. But how valid are these measures of financial success anyway when the surplus has already been reached?
 

How is there no distinction if one is from an official account and another is fan made.

First it was "interpret the source as you will", now the account is being denounced as an outright fake. The petitions that the account is dedicating a portion of its services to are very much real. As for the account's authenticity, I do believe that it could be real, or at least hold connections to a "more official" account.

[Narufan85]

 

Exactly, is every one as INDIVIDUALS. But you are saying that "because of this example" girls are like that. Girls are not "submissive" by rule and choice. Girls doesn't like "romance" by rule and choice. That's what you are saying. Those all are prejucides. It's not like saying "boys are bad at sex" because this is supported social history: Men being in the top of the world and believing that only what they like or care is important. Hence, women being abused. And because of this, men tend to be selfish on bed. There is not previous-sex time. Girls need more time to turn themselves on. Boys only want to put their penises inside and girls fake orgams all the time. 

 

I think you are being a bit unfair in your claims that men are selfish in bed. At least, I can only respond based on my experiences and those I associate with. I think it's become far more common, at least in the US over the last 20 years or so, for men to be very, very cognizant of the specific needs of women. I can't deny that there are many, many men who aren't willing to take the time to properly care for a woman's needs. But I think you are painting with far too broad a brush in this regard. It's a two-way street. I think women are far more comfortable speaking confidently about what they need and men are more willing to provide it.

[RyohkiFan]

I still like NarutoFireFoxUzumaki so don't divorce me!

Watch out...he might cheat on you but I got your back 

[Advaith]

Anything new ?

[ultranx]

Ah, this was from chapter 7. Man, if only we read this clearly.

 

 

Like a band, when one important leaves, it won't be the same.

lol whenever I see yahagi in this pic I think yamaki from digimon tamers xD

[XJohnnyApprovesNarskuX]

DeathGodMack, NaruKushi good pair up ;) after all he loves his dear old mother

[RyohkiFan]

DeathGodMack, NaruKushi good pair up ;) after all he loves his dear old mother

[Khaleesi]

 

I think you are being a bit unfair in your claims that men are selfish in bed. At least, I can only respond based on my experiences and those I associate with. I think it's become far more common, at least in the US over the last 20 years or so, for men to be very, very cognizant of the specific needs of women. I can't deny that there are many, many men who aren't willing to take the time to properly care for a woman's needs. But I think you are painting with far too broad a brush in this regard. It's a two-way street. I think women are far more comfortable speaking confidently about what they need and men are more willing to provide it.

I do believe there are men that can handle it, but if you hear more women, they will all say the same. Maybe there are some examples on their life. But it's extremely weird. I don't believe they are like that because "they were born like that", but they are selfish even if they are not aware of it. They love women to suck their kittens but they can't eat pussy

 

spoiler

Edited by theunburnt, 25 January 2015 - 06:44 PM.

[Chatte]

Interesting who has the dominant position in that picture...

[lupina]

I find DeathGodMack's signature disturbing.

[Tsuki Hoshino]

I find DeathGodMack's signature disturbing.

 I didn't want to say anything...but yea...so I blocked it  

[Nar123]

Why is Yahagi in the front and not Kishi? LOL. Did all these editors leave too?

Yahagi is in the front bc he is the real mastermind behind the original plot of naruto, isnt obvious ?

And yes ,all the editors left

Edited by Nar123, 25 January 2015 - 06:46 PM.

[FireFox]

I still like NarutoFireFoxUzumaki so don't divorce me!

 

Sighs, you are not understanding anything. I'll do this for you:

1) Again, no one said they would be best friends. I'm talking about them being just "a known person". 

2) You are interpreting "day-to-day things" as "hey, so how was your day" or "what are you going to do next summer" kitten like that. I'm saying that it would be something like "Did you see Naruto?" or a necessary question. Because I really doubt Kuarama would allow a "small talk" with anyone. He won't let people to bond with him.

3) Kurama talking with her is not pure utter kitten. Hinata is Naruto's wife. It's expected. 

Again, not as "best friend", but something necessary.

4) The point of this all is saying that Kurama WON'T HATE her. 

5) All this won't make sense if Kuarama is inside Naruto. Is he?

Why Do You always have to start with *Signs*  I'm not boring     . And I understand everything  its just freaking ridiculous  .

 

1. OK  Kurama knows all of Naruto's friends so it makes no difference to me .

 

2. Well you should have put it like that  even so  I don't classify that as " talking " like I said even in the "Last kitten" Hinata was barely able to talk to Naruto and ask him a freaking question  after all that time  now put Kurama in here who is not a kind guy  and understand why its freaking hilarious in the first place . I imagine she would kitten her pants  LOL .

 

3. Yes it is even if she is  his wife going by her personalty  she would take hundred years to ask the freaking question and Kurama he would likely brush her of  .  Its only expected in FF . Again if its something necessary  she doesn't have the balls to do it  but she's a Tsunder now out of nowhere so WTF might as well  let it be  

 

4.Of course he wont hate her  he Hates only Sasuke and the Uchihas  unless Huyga's also have taken advantage of him but that's irrelevant .

 

5. That's True and this discussion is over then        

 

Watch out...he might cheat on you but I got your back 

Beware with who you're messing with   .

[RyohkiFan]

 I didn't want to say anything...but yea...so I blocked it

You can block a sig? 

[Change]

No, I don't. There is admittedly some level of bias underneath their words, but if the film was experiencing negative financial return, there would have been at least some subtle statement provided to paint the film in a more financially questionable light.

Again like I said, when people talk about a movie having a negative return is when the movie flopped by a lot. Other than that, they won't waste their time talking about it.

You're allowed to purposefully gull yourself if you want, but the numbers and the trend of the films' official reception state otherwise.

You're giving me numbers that ARE REVENUE, not PROFIT. I'm not gulling myself to anything, I'm just not jumping the gun for anything. I don't look at big numbers and say "wow that looks nice". Don't start accusing somebody of doing something 

Ironically, the Road to Ninja forum here was so much more active before, during, and after the release of the film. But the attribute which drove many to look at RtN was the alternate universe concept and Kishi's involvement with the story. This time it's just an expected gimmick used to prop up the film even more. It doesn't carry the same intrigue.

The attribute that drove many to The Last was that it was going to be like that last film, a film to "conclude" the series.

 

Also why would ramen need a source if he himself stated he saw way more advertisement. He's not just going to pull something out of his ass. 

Road to Ninja Promotional contents

 
As I said before, the promotional content isn't quite as much like "The Last", but it's still very notable. It doesn't include the cover or additional chapter given to RtN that was inserted into the manga's publications.

And as I said before, I know it was advertised at a notable quantity. But The Last was advertised more, way more. It created even bigger hype. 

Actually, they asserted that for a movie to be deemed successful, it needs to earn back triple the investment. But how valid are these measures of financial success anyway when the surplus has already been reached?

Triple the investment would be really great and ideal, but twice is the minimal possible number you can to say it was a successful. 

It depends how much they earn after they earn back their costs, just because they earn a little more than what they spent doesn't really mean it was a success.

First it was "interpret the source as you will", now the account is being denounced as an outright fake. The petitions that the account is dedicating a portion of its services to are very much real. As for the account's authenticity, I do believe that it could be real, or at least hold connections to a "more official" account.

But nobody was denying the petitions, I knew they existed. 

You can believe in what ever you want in regards to the same dozen accounts. 

Edited by TheMagicConch, 25 January 2015 - 06:50 PM.

[Gaara's hair]

You can block a sig? 

Yeah, don't you see that X where the sig is...