Official Super Hero Movie discussion thread
#41
Posted 06 September 2009 - 07:11 PM
Do note that my superpowers does not include the ability to throw people a really long distance, neither can I challenge the laws of physics and make them weightless. I could probably throw Sam Raimi a little, but not the heavy boulder of awesome that is Mr Nolan. No sir!
#42
Posted 19 September 2009 - 04:51 PM
idk if this is fake or not (the corresponding article says the movie is in pre-production) but if this pic is real maybe Ryan Reynolds really can pull it off....but that is a butt ugly costume.
#44
Posted 19 October 2009 - 12:02 AM
#45
Posted 19 October 2009 - 12:26 AM
#46
Posted 19 October 2009 - 12:39 AM
And the pic looks like it's either CGI or a drawing to me.....
Edited by shadow_Uzumaki, 19 October 2009 - 12:40 AM.
#47
Posted 20 October 2009 - 09:25 AM
As for the Green Lantern movie, I won't judge until I see a trailer. Heck, I know I'll probably enjoy the movie no matter what happens, as I just can't wait to see them use the power ring in a movie. I don't think Ryan will be a copy of Hal from the comics, but perhaps more of an amalgam character based upon several of the GL's. I can see him acting alot like Kyle Rayner. I'm a little happy with the recent rumors about Jackie Earle Haley being cast as Sinestro in the movie, but for nowRorschach as Sinestro is still only a rumor.
The X-Men movies took a bad fall after that dirty Singer-guy ran off to make Superman- The Curse of the Kryptonite Continent, but there's still a lot of X-movies planned. The movie version of the First Class-comic might be the reboot we need, but I'm worried about the casting. And what's with the talk about it being influenced by the Harry Potter movies? If that's true, then I hope Scott and Jean gets into Gryffindor together. Also, after the funfun time we had watching the Wolvie movie, and it's great success, don't wait up for Magnus' spin-of. Magneto's List- Doubtful
I still love Hugh Jackman's Wolverine though, and he did his best in the title movie. If they didn't assrape the franchise like they did, it could have turned out a lot better. Anyway, if you're looking forward to watching Wolvie do Japan... well, don't wait up.
Finally, they're making a movie about a Norse god. I have to say, it's about time since Thor is an awesome comicbook character, and he has a fun library of villains to play with. But is it wrong of me to be more excited about yet another cameo from Stan The Man?
#49
Posted 12 January 2010 - 04:54 AM
I hope this means better films; the only Spidey film I thought was great was the first one.
Edited by dl316bh, 12 January 2010 - 04:55 AM.
#50
Posted 12 January 2010 - 12:11 PM
Tobey did a good job in the first movie, and I think he did well in #2 as well, but as soon as he emo'ed up for the black suit, it went downhill. I would love for Marvel to make a Spider-man movie where Peter is younger and still in school, and use some classic villains other than Doc Oc and the Green Goblin. I wouldn't mind a young spidey VS Black Cat or Morbius (this could make a cameo from Blade possible as well )
Oh well, bring on the goodness.
Edit: Oh... I guess they will reboot the franchise. HOORAY ^^
#51
Posted 13 January 2010 - 01:22 AM
In other news, we have writers for Deadpool:
http://www.variety.c...mp;ref=vertfilm
Very good match, I must say.
#52
Posted 13 January 2010 - 11:04 AM
I second both of these. Also, a Peter Parker that's more like he should be would be great. On top of that, villains who are actually villains would be fantastic as well; it seemed everyone Spidey fought in the previous trilogy had a sympathetic angle.
#53
Posted 13 January 2010 - 11:02 PM
#54
Posted 14 January 2010 - 12:18 AM
#55
Posted 14 January 2010 - 05:49 PM
If I see it, it will be for Nicholas Cage. I'm otherwise not really enthused about Kick Ass. I like about half of Mark Millars comics output, but with Kick Ass he basically said he was doing one thing and then did another completely different one. Considering that, my lack of enthusiasm for the comic kind of translates over to the movie.
Yes please. That was one of the big, gaping exclusions in the original trilogy. The Raimi trilogy missed the boat on so many things that I sometimes can't help but feel like I was watching another superhero wrapped in Spider-Mans trappings.
#56
Posted 14 January 2010 - 11:13 PM
I agree to some extent. I don't think Sympathetic would be how I described the 1st Goblin, at least not until his "don't tell Harry" line. Doc Oc definitely was, Green Goblin II was, Sandman was, Venom was somewhat, but it actually pans out a bit more in the comics than in the movie, so I got no complaints about that. I will agree though that I want a villain with bigger ambitions than kidnapping Mary Jane. Doc Oc did, but something with a bigger picture.
I also agree with this. There were perhaps two wise-cracks in each movie. This is one of the things that defines Spidey.
I'm looking forward to it, but I actually am not looking forward to Nicolas Cage at all. And I'm very curious as to the comedic tone, because to me it seems even more comedic than the comic.
In other news:
It looks like Sinestro may only be introduced as an aspect for a trilogy villain while Dr. Hector Hammond may be the film's main villain.
Joe Johnston says that Captain America will be set mainly during the war era.
And it says here that Sony is trying to still reach it's new date for the new Spiderman film and it's looking at these directors:
James Cameron
David Fincher
Wes Anderson
Marc Webb
Okay Avatards... I gotta say Cameron can make a great looking film, but if you've read his treatment of his Spider-man film back when you'd know that he doesn't give a crap about any of the characters. So dear movie gods, don't let him helm it.
David Fincher would make for an intense Spider-man film, and I like the idea, but he'll probably turn it down. He's made such great films as Zodiac and Fight Club.
Wes Anderson just makes no sense to me, but he would get the awkward teen thing going just right, I'd see the film simply out of curiousity. Don't get me wrong, I love most of his work (Royal Tennembaum, Fantastic Mr. Fox, Darjeeling Limited)
Marc Webb to me might be what we get. The studio is looking for someone they can push around a little and Marc Webb is an Independent film director who may see all the cash he could never have before and let the studio push him around. We'll see.
#58
Posted 15 January 2010 - 05:05 PM
I don't know. I think they had Norman be rather sympathetic through the first movie. He was wrestling with insanity and a second personality; if nothing else, it wasn't too difficult to sympathize with him because he was wrestling with madness.
The thing is, it worked for Norman. That was how he was for the longest time in the comics. A screwed up man with multiple personalities; something Spidey knew and wanted Norman to overcome. Until the night Gwen Stacy died, when it all changed. Aside from the Power Rangers reject costume, the first film was rather faithful to the Norman character.
That's the best way to do it, I think. It allows the films to go into Sinestro's time as a Green Lantern and his spiral downwards. I hope this is the way they go.
This is true, but it's also been fifteen to twenty years since he was pitching the film. Things change in that sort of time. Besides which, Spider-Man at this point isn't struggling to get to the big screen; he'd have to care about the characters or the film would go nowhere.
That said, as much as I love James Camerons films, he wouldn't be my first choice for a director to take over the franchise.
I always found it particularly sad that the tie-in games for each film had more wisecracks in their opening levels than the movies did in their full runtime.
#59
Posted 16 January 2010 - 09:18 PM
Don't worry man, I'm always here to cut your excitement meter in half when needed.
Rumour FATALITY
#60
Posted 21 February 2010 - 12:57 PM
Oh well, Nolan's movies are always genius. Memento FTW.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users