So because SP is like Ed Wood and the old Hollywood B movies I should consider what they did a success? No. What you see as basically "surviving and making cash with what they have", I see a studio that can't attract a market that is obviously out there. I see a creator that has constantly failed to attract a larger audeince.
This is a failure by any honest measure. If you do not reach the wider audience that your are trying to reach, you are not a major success. At best SP can be called a B anime studio, and Kishimoto can be called Japan's modern Ed Wood.
SP and Kishimoto have failed to reach their market potential. There is no getting around that. Saying it's been that way for a long time just means they've been stuck in place, and don't know how to expand.
You and I don't have the same defintion of success. You seem to think so long as they survive a bit more then some people thought they would they are a roaring success. I see them as the B level studio they are, and won't cheer for them anymore then I would cheer for a Sci Fi Channel film that made it's budget back and a decent profit. Obvously if Naruto's story was strong enough to draw in a larger audience it wouldn't be with this studio to begin with.
Why can't that potential audience be entertained? Is it because the studio failed in an endeavour that has withdrawn from their reserves of budget for thirteen consecutive years? Or could it be that the subject matter in general doesn't appeal to the demographics who find appeal in the series like OP and DBZ? But the comparison doesn't hold because from what I'm reading, this Ed Wood person was the architect of of various low-budget films that pander to an older demographic interested in erotic imagery, as well as various other low-key books/movies of other genres that appear to have only garnered a following in fringe circles because of their ambiguous quality and usage of exaggerated tropes.
Lower in quality compared to other popular brand names, Naruto was always known within the mainstream, and with regards to the international market, it's even more popular than One Piece. Naruto might have earned itself controversy with its substandard quality in the past few years and with its suggestive choice for an ending, but the recognition, acclaim, and yes, profit earnings as well are real.
Coincidentally, it so happens that One Piece and Dragonball are the only two manga to score higher than Naruto in terms of overall sells. That success translates into the anime as well, albeit in a somewhat less glamourous light. So this idea of comparing an obscured creator of B-rate sexploit films to one of the most recognisable anime/manga series in the world is a false equivalency.
Edited by Atheck, 17 January 2015 - 05:27 AM.