Lid told me about Golden Time
8.5/10
I wasnt prepared for this journey because Lid told me literally nothing about it.
Edited by Fyuria'sLeo, 08 May 2015 - 10:21 PM.
Posted 08 May 2015 - 10:21 PM
Lid told me about Golden Time
8.5/10
I wasnt prepared for this journey because Lid told me literally nothing about it.
Edited by Fyuria'sLeo, 08 May 2015 - 10:21 PM.
Posted 08 May 2015 - 10:46 PM
That's good to hear. I heard some people don't want to start the original b/c it doesn't follow the manga, but I'll try not to let that influence my overall impression.
Posted 08 May 2015 - 11:21 PM
That's good to hear. I heard some people don't want to start the original b/c it doesn't follow the manga, but I'll try not to let that influence my overall impression.
FMA 2003 is one of the very few anime to handle its manga divergence extremely well, to the point where it forms its own themes and tone (and characters, in many cases) completely separate from its source material. Some plot points are similar (and you'll definitely notice the recurring ones early on, having seen Brotherhood), but the intent behind a lot of them is altered and the story builds in a completely different direction by the end.
Even when similar plot points are happening, there are a lot of minor differences in the background setting up for what happens later in the show. It doesn't follow the manga exactly up to a certain point, and then suddenly get different. It sprinkles the differences in all throughout before it ever even reaches its "solid" divergence point. Definitely leave the manga/Brotherhood at the door; the experience will be a lot less confusing, and a lot more enjoyable.
Haven't watched the original but I might someday. I heard Lust is less evil in that one.
Lust ends up being of the most developed characters in general in the original series, funnily enough.
Edited by CloudMountainJuror, 08 May 2015 - 11:37 PM.
"The time has come at last for you to learn everything . . .
Fare thee well, Albert, my friend."
Posted 08 May 2015 - 11:25 PM
FMA 2003 is one of the very few anime to handle its manga divergence extremely well, to the point where it forms its own themes and tone completely separate from its source material. Some plot points are similar (and you'll definitely notice the recurring ones early on, having seen Brotherhood), but the intent behind a lot of them is altered and the story builds in a completely different direction by the end. Definitely leave the manga/Brotherhood at the door; the experience will be a lot less confusing, and a lot more enjoyable.
Lust ends up being of the most developed characters in general in the original series, funnily enough.
Thanks for letting me know that beforehand ^_^ Do you happen to know if Hiromu Arakawa took part in the development of the original series?
Edited by trang95, 08 May 2015 - 11:25 PM.
G . I . N . T . A . M .A
Posted 08 May 2015 - 11:43 PM
Thanks for letting me know that beforehand ^_^ Do you happen to know if Hiromu Arakawa took part in the development of the original series?
I'm not sure if she did. On one hand it wouldn't surprise me if she did, considering how well thought-out it is, but on the other hand it's so tonally different in comparison to the manga that I have trouble seeing her contributing much to the production.
"The time has come at last for you to learn everything . . .
Fare thee well, Albert, my friend."
Posted 08 May 2015 - 11:48 PM
I'm not sure if she did. On one hand it wouldn't surprise me if she did, considering how well thought-out it is, but on the other hand it's so tonally different in comparison to the manga that I have trouble seeing her contributing much to the production.
I see. I've seldomly seen an anime that is still good when it diverges from it's original source completely (Akame ga Kill- the horror). Oh, that reminds me! Brotherhood has a movie so I'll watch that soon.
G . I . N . T . A . M .A
Posted 09 May 2015 - 12:05 AM
I see. I've seldomly seen an anime that is still good when it diverges from it's original source completely (Akame ga Kill- the horror). Oh, that reminds me! Brotherhood has a movie so I'll watch that soon.
Same. Both Soul Eater and Blue Exorcist diverged from their manga counterparts, and they were both underwhelming in the end. But that's partly why the original FMA is so special. It pulled it off.
Sacred Star of Milos is worth a watch, at the very least for the interesting world-building it does.
"The time has come at last for you to learn everything . . .
Fare thee well, Albert, my friend."
Posted 09 May 2015 - 09:10 AM
Posted 09 May 2015 - 04:45 PM
I like Yugioh but it really is a lame show. Rewatched all 200+ episodes and it is terrible. The filler arc with the grand championships is the absolute worst. I give the show a 4/10.
Bakura is the only decent villain in the series. Was also disappointed that Mai & Joey and Yugi & Tea never hooked up. Kaiba's hilarious but dramatic cheesy voice-acting over a card game isn't enough to save this show.
Yugi and Tea...the feels killed me.
Also if you ever watch another Yu Gi Oh I, 5D's is pretty solid.
Posted 09 May 2015 - 04:56 PM
FMA 2003 is one of the very few anime to handle its manga divergence extremely well, to the point where it forms its own themes and tone (and characters, in many cases) completely separate from its source material. Some plot points are similar (and you'll definitely notice the recurring ones early on, having seen Brotherhood), but the intent behind a lot of them is altered and the story builds in a completely different direction by the end.
Even when similar plot points are happening, there are a lot of minor differences in the background setting up for what happens later in the show. It doesn't follow the manga exactly up to a certain point, and then suddenly get different. It sprinkles the differences in all throughout before it ever even reaches its "solid" divergence point. Definitely leave the manga/Brotherhood at the door; the experience will be a lot less confusing, and a lot more enjoyable.
Lust ends up being of the most developed characters in general in the original series, funnily enough.
I'm very leery about anime that divert from the manga because I generally end up finding it a disappointing experience, but you're making me want to give this one a try.
Posted 09 May 2015 - 11:48 PM
I'm very leery about anime that divert from the manga because I generally end up finding it a disappointing experience, but you're making me want to give this one a try.
Trust me, it's totally worth your time. I fully understand your hesitation, but this one is really, truly worth it. It isn't like the others.
It does sadden me that FMA 2003 is so often overlooked now simply because of the fact that it diverges from the manga. I wrote up something a semi-recently on this; I'll just paste it here, as I don't think I can better express it now than I did then.
If it wasn't obvious by now, I absolutely adore FMA 2003. It was the first anime I saw that really opened me up to the medium (around...god, I think it was about 8 years ago now) and made me realize it could do amazing things, beyond just simple action. And it's only gotten better over time. Every time I watch it again, I pick up something I didn't notice the last time around that makes me appreciate it more. I love the show to death.
Also, it's important to note that I'm disregarding the movie sequel to FMA 2003; I'm only talking about the core 51-episode series itself. Very important to note that.
Edited by CloudMountainJuror, 10 May 2015 - 12:02 AM.
"The time has come at last for you to learn everything . . .
Fare thee well, Albert, my friend."
Posted 10 May 2015 - 12:39 AM
People just need to be more open and take a risk. I honestly am open to almost- almost- anything. The only genre I struggle with is Mecha tbh.
Trust me, it's totally worth your time. I fully understand your hesitation, but this one is really, truly worth it. It isn't like the others.
It does sadden me that FMA 2003 is so often overlooked now simply because of the fact that it diverges from the manga. I wrote up something a semi-recently on this; I'll just paste it here, as I don't think I can better express it now than I did then.
The post is spoiler-free, just putting it in spoiler tags so it doesn't eat up space
If it wasn't obvious by now, I absolutely adore FMA 2003.It was the first anime I saw that really opened me up to the medium (around...god, I think it was about 8 years ago now) and made me realize it could do amazing things, beyond just simple action. And it's only gotten better over time. Every time I watch it again, I pick up something I didn't notice the last time around that makes me appreciate it more. I love the show to death.
Also, it's important to note that I'm disregarding the movie sequel to FMA 2003; I'm only talking about the core 51-episode series itself. Very important to note that.
Edited by trang95, 10 May 2015 - 12:47 AM.
G . I . N . T . A . M .A
Posted 10 May 2015 - 01:20 AM
Yugi and Tea...the feels killed me.
Also if you ever watch another Yu Gi Oh I, 5D's is pretty solid.
Posted 10 May 2015 - 03:48 AM
People just need to be more open and take a risk. I honestly am open to almost- almost- anything. The only genre I struggle with is Mecha tbh.
An anime adaptation that diverges from the manga a lot (but not completely) is Cardcaptor Sakura. I saw the anime first, so I was totally surprised to see that the manga was different. In the end, I ended up loving both! But the differences b/w the anime and manga of Cardcaptor Sakura were on a smaller scale than compared to the FMA (2003) and the manga.
In a way, I wonder if I should have watched FMA (2003) first b/c you know... the animation is not as good as in FMAB. - Same happened to me with Fate/Stay Night. I watched Fate/Zero first, and then the Studio Deen version (the animation- the horror!)
FMA 2003 is a better starting point than FMAB definitely, though not only because of the animation. It's a much better introduction to the central cast and concept of alchemy in general, even with the drastic differences between the two versions. FMAB just throws you in the thick of it and doesn't bother much with character introduction or world-building early on; it kinda assumes the audience is already familiar with FMA going in. FMA 2003, on the other hand, builds everything from the ground up. In that way, bizarrely, it's more loyal to the manga than FMAB is.
That being said, the animation for FMA 2003 isn't bad at all, really. It's not as flashy as FMAB's, but FMA 2003 isn't an action-driven show like FMAB is, so the gritter, more realistic animation/art style better fits the tone of the series. And when they do have significant action scenes, it's still animated well. Just don't expect any bouncing-off-the-walls action, is all; the fights in FMA 2003 are generally a lot more grounded.
Edited by CloudMountainJuror, 10 May 2015 - 03:48 AM.
"The time has come at last for you to learn everything . . .
Fare thee well, Albert, my friend."
Posted 10 May 2015 - 08:51 AM
FMA 2003 is a better starting point than FMAB definitely, though not only because of the animation. It's a much better introduction to the central cast and concept of alchemy in general, even with the drastic differences between the two versions. FMAB just throws you in the thick of it and doesn't bother much with character introduction or world-building early on; it kinda assumes the audience is already familiar with FMA going in. FMA 2003, on the other hand, builds everything from the ground up. In that way, bizarrely, it's more loyal to the manga than FMAB is.
That being said, the animation for FMA 2003 isn't bad at all, really. It's not as flashy as FMAB's, but FMA 2003 isn't an action-driven show like FMAB is, so the gritter, more realistic animation/art style better fits the tone of the series. And when they do have significant action scenes, it's still animated well. Just don't expect any bouncing-off-the-walls action, is all; the fights in FMA 2003 are generally a lot more grounded.
Posted 10 May 2015 - 09:17 AM
I actually like how Brotherhood starts off right in the thick of things, I don't need an anime encylopedia to explain the basics of fictional alchemy. I hate manga like that, if I wanted to read a manual about made-up things I'd buy the profile books or something. Nardo sucked in that way by always explaining the crappy chakra systems Kishi made up instead of focusing on the story and on less trivial things.
It doesn't need to be an anime encyclopedia, it just needs to competently tell a story. FMAB's single biggest weakness is how it didn't bother doing that at the start, just shoving all the characters on-screen without properly introducing them, instead reducing most of them to simple gimmicks.
Now, FMA 2003 wasn't an alchemy textbook, if that's what you're implying. It just introduced the concept in general a lot more naturally.
Also, whether you like it or not, a story's universe needs to make sense. If it doesn't make sense, it has nothing to stand on. For Naruto, there needed to be that bit of chakra explanation to ground the tons of things that were going on. Otherwise, it would just end up a nonsensical mess any time a fight started happening, and because of the lack of coherency, a lot of the battles early on would have just been all style and no substance. Hell, Shikamaru vs. Temari was one of the best battles of the Chuunin Exams because of its fleshed out strategy. If there was no explanation behind how Shikamaru's shadows worked, there would have been no tension or excitement. It would have just been mindless.
Edited by CloudMountainJuror, 10 May 2015 - 09:25 AM.
"The time has come at last for you to learn everything . . .
Fare thee well, Albert, my friend."
Posted 10 May 2015 - 09:28 AM
It doesn't need to be an anime encyclopedia, it just needs to competently tell a story. FMAB's single biggest weakness is how it didn't bother doing that at the start, instead just lazily shoving all the characters on-screen without properly introducing them, instead reducing most of them to simple gimmicks.
Posted 10 May 2015 - 09:42 AM
Well I didn't watch the entirety of the original series yet but I think Brotherhood's doing just fine introducing and developing the characters. I didn't need any pretext to understand the story or anything. I'm only disappointed that [omitted].
Brotherhood does a fine job of introducing other characters outside the first episode, mostly. It's just the first episode cramming Ed's, Al's, Mustang's, Hughes's, Armstrong's, Kimblee's, Bradley's, and maybe even more people's introductions into it. They could have been handled infinitely better, established a lot more respectfully.
You might want to spoiler tag that part about Lust. Though, on that topic, that part's one of the most epic scenes in the show. Love that scene.
Edited by CloudMountainJuror, 13 May 2015 - 05:20 AM.
"The time has come at last for you to learn everything . . .
Fare thee well, Albert, my friend."
Posted 11 May 2015 - 03:35 PM
Trust me, it's totally worth your time. I fully understand your hesitation, but this one is really, truly worth it. It isn't like the others.
It does sadden me that FMA 2003 is so often overlooked now simply because of the fact that it diverges from the manga. I wrote up something a semi-recently on this; I'll just paste it here, as I don't think I can better express it now than I did then.
The post is spoiler-free, just putting it in spoiler tags so it doesn't eat up space
If it wasn't obvious by now, I absolutely adore FMA 2003.
It was the first anime I saw that really opened me up to the medium (around...god, I think it was about 8 years ago now) and made me realize it could do amazing things, beyond just simple action. And it's only gotten better over time. Every time I watch it again, I pick up something I didn't notice the last time around that makes me appreciate it more. I love the show to death.
Also, it's important to note that I'm disregarding the movie sequel to FMA 2003; I'm only talking about the core 51-episode series itself. Very important to note that.
I'm sold. I was planning to watch FMA:B again soon, but I'm going to go ahead and watch the first series before I do that.
Posted 12 May 2015 - 02:59 AM
Wolf Children- 9.5/10
This movie is such an emotional ride, I'm done right now:
EDIT: Btw, the movie was directed by Mamoru Hosoda, one of Japan's most talented Japanese anime film directors in my eyes. He also directed the movies The Girl Who Leapt Through Time (2007) and Summer Wars (2009), both of which got awards (similar to the Oscar in the US). He also directed the first Digimon Adventure Movies.
Edited by trang95, 13 May 2015 - 01:12 AM.
G . I . N . T . A . M .A
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users