The gaiden was not for providing feels for SS. It was to show to people he was not sexist. This was explained in an interview he did along with his brother. The gaiden was originally going to be a one-shot like what Cups got. But then Kishimoto heard about all the people that considered him a sexist. So in an attempt to try and prove those people wrong he extended the one shot into a miniseries gaiden. That by focusing on the main character that was a girl would prove that he was not sexist.
That's a major difference between the gaiden and the adaptation. The gaiden was all about Salad. So it focused on her problems with her family, her growing bond with Naruto, her love of the woman that raised her, and her desire by the end to become hokage. SP made the arc try to justify and defend SS. So everything was devoted to showing SS as not as negative as previously shown.
And it failed....miserably.
Not only did the message he supposedly intended went over people's heads....AGAIN....., but he also attacked the problem from the wrong angle. "I am not sexist, I made Salad the main character of this short manga," but Sakura is still an obsessive housewife who everyone thinks is useless. Man, Kishimoto is worse than Marvel when it comes to listening to what fans actually want.
Marvel has this big PR problem with SJW and diversity in Marvel profits. Marvel assumes that the reason why they are losing sales is because as they claim "people aren't into diversity and are racist, sexist, and etc." Wrong. People are just sick and tired of them focusing on too much diversity and not actually finishing a story arc. They keep printing more and more stories with most not getting an ending or not enough time to invest in the comic or the characters before they change it again. Fans are telling them to slow down and take their time making good stories and Marvel just kittenes back that people are too racists/sexist and against diversity. Essentially, SJWs are runing comic books.
Kishimoto is doing something very similar. He is assuming one and doing the opposite of what we mean. I mentioned this in a previous post, but I will say again:
"Sakura is useless and too obsessive over Sasuke. That is sexist to have a woman revolve around a man."
Instead of Kishimoto taking a step back and saying "Maybe Sakura needs to change drastically" he keeps going with it and says "I'll just make another girl the main focus and take away from Sakura. See? I am not sexist. I love women." Why Kishimoto? Why are you ignoring the most obvious thing and trying to distract us from the real problem? Is it because you are scared to change SS and NH and instead go with something more believable? Really, why not go back and retcon everything saying "This is how it really should end." I don't see what the problem is really. If they are worried about profits, wouldn't this bring people back for real instead of trying to trick them into something else? Is he really that scared to make NS canon and change several other details because SP and SJ are some kinf of boogey men out to get him?
Again, making NS canon would have solved some of these problems, but for some reasons this is out of the question.
And I refuse to think that this can't be done. It can be done so easily since he already retconned everything else.

Does the fandom see Sakura in a better light? Do they say she is still useless and obsessive? (rhetorical.)
Edited by James S Cassidy, 03 December 2017 - 05:02 AM.