But....Kishimoto said in an interview that they were not happy. He said that there is no reason why they are together, Sakura is a drug addict, and they could get a divorce. How is this even an argument on this?
And I am not even talking about Sasuke not being home at all, Sasuke not even being able to touch his wife, Sakura looking miserable and upset whenever their relationship is called into questions, and even Naruto telling Sasuke "Would it kill you to go home everyone once and a while?"
Not even looking at story visual, but story elements.
Now is NH unhappy? That one is debatable. However, while I can't say on what Kishimoto thinks because he hasnm't said either way unlike SS, it is apparenty in Gaiden that Naruto seems to have a brighter disposition around Salad and Sakura than he does his own kids and family....so what does that tell?
If we are going to play the intent game, then why don't we do this with every story element? What was the intent with Sakura confession? What was the intent of Sasuke speech in chapter 693? What was the intent of Sasuke and Naruto holding hands at the end with their blood? What was the intent of Minato making note of Sakura and how she was like Kushina? What was the intent of the entire story? Do you really accept that Kishimoto's intent was an entire red herring?
Just the fact that we argue intent is enough for me to say "There is something wrong here" especially with the fandom in such disarray
Which is what I said. Did you even read the post in it's entirely or any of the other posts I made around that one?
I mean, I even brought up the fact that there are different timeline in the DBZ story thanks toTtrunks who changed it. You have one timeline where Goku died of a heart disease and almost all the Z fighters were killed except for Gohan and Trunks was from that one. You have a timeline where Trunks defeated the androids, cell killed trunks and took his time machine, and you have two more timelines with the one we are on now and another one with a different outcome of Cell's original timeline. Why couldn't GT be one of these? You can also have Super be the timeline A with Trunks and the rest being B,C,D,E.
Did you not understand this?
I wasn't even talking about the Death battle at all, so why are you even bringing it up? All I mentioned was the timeline in DBZ can be seen something similar to the timelines in DC and could explain alot of things. Since Trunks proved this in the series itself I would like to think this is the case. GT is canon, but it is of a different timeline.
You say you don't want to argue about it and yet you're the one that brought it up. You say you don't care who won, but you're the one that brought it up. Obviously, you have some major issues with it all and I can see you're a very much Pro-Goku, Anti-Superman, Pro-Goku should have won crowd. Wiz and
Whiz and Boomstick have said in a discussion that they are Goku fans all the way. That they find Superman boring and don't like him at all. Like many other DBZ fanboys. they said he is too OP. Yet, you want to claim something that they said the opposite of.
Wizard Magazine said that Goku would beat Superman because Superman would die from a fall from orbit. Do you think that is not biased or do you think that is spot on? Even though Superman has survived being thrown from orbit . "Oh look, he stood up moments later being more pissed off than hurt."
Again, you're the one bringing this up. I made the Superman Q and A thread for a reason so go there if you want facts and traits. So what if I am nitpicking Super apart. You're nitpicking Superman apart even right now and I don't give a kitten.
I will say this one last time
It doesn't matter about the calculations. Goku and Superman do not fit the same mold. Goku has NEVER been invinicble. His entire character structure is breaking limits and overcoming his own limitations through training and hardwork. Superman is not that same type of hero. Superman is a type of hero that who wins by showing that he is better than the villains he fights. He is suppsoed to the show the best we can be. It is not whether or not he loses a fight, but whether he is doing the right thing. Superman will always find a way to win. He has been around for 75+ years.
A man who can overcome any limit vs a man who has no limits in the first place. End of story.
For the record, I believe Saitama can beat Goku because of the same concept. Saitama is meant to be limitless regardless if he is a satire or not. The idea is is that Saitama is meant to beat any opposition thrown at him. End of story. I am sorry you don't accept this and you don't have to. You can continue to believe Goku is the strongest character to have ever been made...that's fine. I am not gonna change your opinion just like you can't change mine. We are going to keep going in circles.The only difference now is that I don't care anymore, but you do. So either find your own answers or shut up. I am done with the arguing, but you keep bringing it up.
I think Superman can beat Goku without breaking a sweat, you think Goku can beat Superman without breaking a sweat. If that is what helps you sleep at night, fine.
Just stop already.
I think goku can beat certain versions of superman but not beat superman period without breaking a sweat, but even then I find the fights pointless, they're both heroes, they wouldn't ever fight, I think it'd be more likely they'd team up, I'd prefer a hero vs villain fight, I've always found the whole goku vs superman thing dumb. I have said this several times but you don't seem to take the hint. I nitpick the superman 1 million thing and the calcs on goku to prove death battle is not accurate, has nothing to do with me wanting one of them to win, I will say it again, I don't care who wins, I find the whole idea of the fight dumb. I don't even like death battle period. all they ever do is make the videos to get a rise out of the fandoms to cause more fandom wars, now ever since that goku vs superman battle both fandoms are always at war, its dumb. I can't even go on a dbz abridged video without superman being brought up.
seriously you keep going on and on about how I'm such a dbz fanboy and want superman to lose, but here's the difference between me and you, I don't treat death battle as fact, you do, you care about versus debates, I find them boring and pointless, you think I'm wasting my time debunking superman and arguing with you, when all I've been doing is enjoying sonic forces and pokemon ultra sun and I come back to you starting another of your superman arguments. I used to like superman, you though are actually making me hate superman because of how you keep acting and treating me like a dbz fanboy if I even criticize death battle, enough is enough dude, stop, just stop. I liked superman when he wasn't this all perfect being you make him out to be, I prefer the shows and movies, but I am more knowledgeable about dbz, I have all of dbz memorized, it was my favorite show, but I admit goku isn't perfect and can be beaten, but I also don't downplay any feats any character in dbz is capable of, nor do I do it for superman. Now can you finally drop this whole superman argument thing please?
I have autism okay, one trait of autism is you're really passionate about something to the point you want to know everything there is to know about it, for me, that's dragon ball, I am knowledgeable about dragon ball, and can tell when death battle gets something wrong. that's all, I don't give a crap about goku losing, I just don't like how he was nerfed. same with the sonic vs mario death battle, sonic should have cut through mario like butter with a single sonic spin because mario is a human being, he isn't more durable than eggman's robots. its not about who wins or loses, its about getting it right.
Edited by ultranx, 23 November 2017 - 02:15 AM.