I feel like people just need to ask the right questions.
Except you aren't questioning anything in the story itself, you are just dogmatically defending any criticism towards the series by saying any criticism is just reading it wrong and forming an OPINIONATED interpretation of the scenes presented towards you while presenting your opinions as fact.
Naruto suddenly marries Hinata? You decide Sakura was never meant to be the love interest. We ask why and HOW Hinata was always meant to be the love interest? you dodge the question and go on a spiel about how the development was always there and that Sakura and Naruto's relationship was only platonic, just because Kishimoto stated Hinata was meant to be the love interest from the beginning. Guess what? that doesn't work because of two major factors. first of all Naruto would be free to just pick and marry Hinata out of the blue without any development or social interaction if he was a typical shonen protagonist that is either chaste and oblivious to romance, or has no interest in it. That is the only way one can conceivably end up with anyone without story validation, like in Dragon Ball. BUT, Naruto has has a blatant romantic interest in Sakura from the beginning, so he is NOT chaste. Second, to move on from a first love to a second love, closure is required for the first love that will let the character move on to their second love, like in Cardcaptor Sakura. BUT Naruto did not did not move on from Sakura, judging by what was shown in the manga since he said Sakura was his girlfriend to Minato when he could have said no, point to Hinata and say THAT IS my girlfriend, and Sakura did not have a healthy relationship with Sasuke as her first love which was rectified in part II where he tries to kill her and belittles her usefulness quite a bit. Plus, "The Last" not only makes a superficial excuse that doesn't make sense, it also destroys Naruto's character and makes it seem he And Sakura were only using each other. but of course you're welcome to excuse that with as much brain gymnastics as you want. I'll be waiting.
We say that the themes and morals of Naruto were dropped at the last second but you say that the it is fine and say everything was accomplished. RIGHT. So why is Naruto some sort of "Jesus" like figure that is supposed to stop war and conflict and achieve peace, Yet even after the world war the world system stays as it always has, and international conflicts still exist? and this is after Naruto promised Nagato to end war and conflict. Wow, Nagato would be SO GLAD to live in the current era because Naruto failed to change anything, am I right?
Why did Naruto tell Neji to stop acting like Destiny is a determined outcome, yet he (VERY ironically) has some sort of great destiny to stop hatred in the world and unify people which he, Naruto, Happily accepts and Neji dies to protect his identical cousin just like like his father did. So apparently you have your choices but your choices will still end up as the destiny you were meant to fulfill, and you can't fight fate just like Neji said. Glad to know
Naruto could do Kage Bunshin when he was 6 years old to protect his beloved future "waifu" Hinata from bullies, So what was the point of him getting that forbidden technique scroll from chapter one, and why did he fail the academy exam again and again? guess he must LOVE READING, and he WANTED to fail.
Why does Naruto neglect his family and tells his son that you have to put up with loneliness and neglect even though HE, Naruto was an orphan and never knew his parents? and no it is not because he is Hokage, and the job is consuming his time. Hizuren had time to go visit Konohamaru's class study at the Hokage monument and tell the class that he considers all of them his family and give them good life advice, and Tsunade had time to go drinking with Jiraiya when they brought up Kushina for the first time ever in the narrative. YES, they definitely were too busy to do those things.
Oh and don't give me any excuses on how to NOT compare Naruto to other literature or fictional media because that is stating Naruto is a special exception of storytelling which it is not. Stories have always had similar writing structures and expectations because of the Eons/millennia/centuries Human beings have been telling them. Sure no story is exactly the same, but if structures, basic premises and themes were not SIMILAR, why do we have cliches then? Why do we have expectations on how a story is supposed to conclude? Your arguments don't sound convincing at all, even though you claim to be some sort of authority on literary study.
Edited by Phantom_999, 15 October 2017 - 11:49 PM.