No? To say it is platonic would explain what his feelings had always been. Pre-Not-Retcon and Post-Not-Retcon Naruto did love Sakura, as a friend. No one is denying this, so no facts are being denied.
Therefore, you're saying that Naruto no longer loved Sakura as a friend according to the databook. Do tell what happened to make him stop loving her a friend after the ending. Again, silly argument. Quit denying facts.
The promise in itself does not, but 467 does. Naruto's words very strongly recognizes that not only Sakura is lying to him, but that she stills loves Sasuke. Sakura assumed that Naruto's feelings were a driver, as did Sai, but they were not. Misunderstanding and under-estimating Naruto is thematic within the story. With this not being a driver of Naruto's feelings, what really is the evidence that these feelings are romantic love, is the error not one's assumption that the crush remains status quo?
Again, non sequitur. You are trying to force something that does not follow. Sakura not being the driver to save Sasuke does not erase his feelings for Sakura; they are independent of each other. We've been shown Naruto's feelings for Sakura long before saving Sasuke ever became an issue, so nothing you say follows.
The databooks say Naruto loves her and say he loved her until a certain point. There's no ignoring this. Nor is there any ignoring Naruto's genuine heartfelt reactions throughout various scenes in the manga (i.e. the Tsunade hospital scene in part 1 and him telling us why he can't confess to Sakura). Quit denying facts.
I'm actually not ignoring this scene. The fault here is your assumption that Naruto is saying that he isn't confessing to Sakura because of the promise, when just chapters later, we learn the promise has nothing to do with anything, and is not driven by feelings with Sakura.
Nope, he literally isn't confessing to Sakura because of the promise. That's his words. Are you saying he was lying? Naruto intended to save Sasuke regardless of the promise due to having a pre-existing bond with him. We've known this since part one. His bond with Sasuke and his promise to Sakura are independent of each other. Quit denying facts.
At best, you are misinterpreting what the databooks are saying. At worst, you could argue the databooks themselves are off, which they aren't, so it's probably an at best situation. Still no Retcon.
Don't we have interviews about purposeful insertions of a Red Herring in the 600s to cloud things up? I know because we are told and shown this.
The databooks say he loved her. There's no getting around that as you've learned over the weekend.
We have no interviews stating that the databooks are red herrings, but even if we did . . . the pre-ending material establishes one fact (Naruto loves Sakura) and the post-ending material establishes a different fact (Naruto never loved Sakura) without making any term to explain or justify the previous established facts. That's a retcon and no amount of running around like a headless chicken inventing new words (i.e. "platonic love") to be used over the words used in the actual published material is going to change this. Quit denying facts.
But the Last quantifies a difference between this love you are bringing up and the later love Naruto has, the latter being absolutely romantic love, which he experiences for the first time, thus First Love. That is why I call this former love a crush, or platonic love in it's present form; it is the -fitting- term of what we are shown. This one has shallow origins, and fades away from that, instead, becoming a very close friendship. This isn't a Retcon, because this is what happens within the manga.
Show us precisely where the Last says anything about "quantifying a difference" between the love Naruto had for Sakura pre-ending and the love he had for her post-ending. Sakura says nothing about "crushes" or "platonic love." What she tells us is that Naruto didn't love her. Period. She doesn't say a thing about friendship. Nor does the manga for that matter. Quit making stuff up.
By definition it cannot be doing this, particularly when the interpretation offered is one had by many for a long time, who have called such out.
And I imagine that if Rowling came out with a new Harry Potter book where we're told that Harry and Draco have been having secret gay-trysts all throughout their time at Hogwarts and that they're gonna divorce their wives and get together, there would be no retcons there due to the existence of the vocal Harry x Draco fanbase. Quit grasping at straws.
Edited by ThroughWithLove, 26 September 2017 - 02:20 PM.