I got a comment from one of my videos and this is what this person says:
"When you look at the 4 Great Ninja War Arc as a whole, it's sad that not only Kubo is doing a better job with it's final arc in bleach, but it's even more sad when even The FullBring arc (the worst arc in Bleach) had not only better pacing, but a better story to tell from start to finish then what happened with Naruto. Believe me the valid points in the FullBring points are really noticeable for making it the worst arc in bleach, but compared to The 4th Great Ninja War Arc it's a lot better."
As a man who read both...
I agree. FullBring Arc did accomplish things that were said in the beginning. It didn't take long and it was largely straightforward. The arc was flawed (to the point people stopped caring), but it did what it was said and didn't do anything remotely insulting or controversial.
This arc, however, felt out of place and the ending made it solid on why the arc was a dud by the end. It loses focus, it gave too much exposition that the other one that truly needed didn't get, kept jumping characters and their thoughts (one minute determined, the other minute weak), and so on. Not to mention, the arc became 1/3 of the series, as to say this series is literally based on that and everything before it is like fanmade. Even the very end, they made it seem like War Arc only happened and never truly give a value meaning of the story but instead, say that you just witnessed an episode of Powerpuff Girls: one problem at a time.
It just feels lost.