779 replies to this topic

[Setto Kaiba]

 

All that facepalming and snarkiness, you got any better approach than bully and suppression techniques?

[totherpage95]

What exactly about a " white nationalist terrorist" makes him right wing?

well it doesn't but you can argue that some people who are right wing have the same beliefs or prejudice against muslims. i find it hard to believe that you are non partisan but suddenly started to sympathize with the right and do the same kind of spreading of misinformation that pro trump internet trolls do

[Setto Kaiba]

I did say I lean more to the right, and I have been researching a lot, too. 

 

I was a leftist for a while, but then I saw the hypocrisy of it all so I left the party entirely. 

Edited by Setto Kaiba, 14 March 2017 - 01:47 AM.

[sushi.]

The person who attacked the mosque was a white supremacist, and right wing. No one said being the first caused the latter.

[totherpage95]

Uh-huh. And I bet the Russians hacked the election, too, didn't they?

yes it seems it's a fact that's why people want a investigation to make sure trump wasn't involved with russia influencing the election. but if you don't believe the media or the fbi/cia or facts you wouldn't know i guess

[totherpage95]

I did say I lean more to the right, and I have been researching a lot, too. 

 

I was a leftist for a while, but then I saw the hypocrisy of it all so I left the party entirely. 

really? you said you weren't affiliated with the left or the right and are now right and now you are saying you were left but are now right. 

that really isn't believable unless that "research" brainwashes thoroughly and quickly

[Setto Kaiba]

yes it seems it's a fact that's why people want a investigation to make sure trump wasn't involved with russia influencing the election. but if you don't believe the media or the fbi/cia or facts you wouldn't know i guess

To this day, there has been 0 evidence of the Russians interfering with the election. None. Hillary lost. That's the end of it.

 

However, Wikileaks continue to expose the corruption of the left. So feel free to keep beating a dead horse that's already been turned to glue as much as you like as far as I'm concerned. In my experience, the Russian "investigation" is just pushing more and more people away from the Democratic party because it shows the left refuses to admit Trump won. 

 

I also find it pretty ironic how the left called Trump a threat to democracy when he said he'd wait and see what happens if Hillary won the election. Now, it's the same people that threw a fit for that, that are causing all the problems now. Hypocrisy at its best right there. 

 

Edit: I very specifically said I lean more towards the right. Go back and read. Also, because I defend Trump from the BS of the left doesn't mean I actually support him. I'm starting to like him more and more because he's exposing the media, but he does say some pretty stupid stuff now and again. 

 

Anything else you want to add?

Edited by Setto Kaiba, 14 March 2017 - 01:56 AM.

[totherpage95]

To this day, there has been 0 evidence of the Russians interfering with the election. None. Hillary lost. That's the end of it.

 

However, Wikileaks continue to expose the corruption of the left. So feel free to keep beating a dead horse that's already been turned to glue as much as you like as far as I'm concerned. In my experience, the Russian "investigation" is just pushing more and more people away from the Democratic party because it shows the left refuses to admit Trump won. 

 

I also find it pretty ironic how the left called Trump a threat to democracy when he said he'd wait and see what happens if Hillary won the election. Now, it's the same people that threw a fit for that, that are causing all the problems now. Hypocrisy at its best right there. 

  there is evidence the russians interfered with the election but the cia/fbi have not declassified it. what you said makes no sense. the left isn't saying russia interfered with the election it's the intelligence agencies which are non partisan or actually more right leaning

[Setto Kaiba]

  there is evidence the russians interfered with the election but the cia/fbi have not declassified it. what you said makes no sense. the left isn't saying russia interfered with the election it's the intelligence agencies which are non partisan or actually more right leaning

Link.  I'd like to see this "proof". 

 

http://www.dailywire...-james-barrett#

 

 

 

Hate to break it to you, but you're out of luck, buddy. 

Edited by Setto Kaiba, 14 March 2017 - 02:14 AM.

[totherpage95]

Link.  I'd like to see this "proof". 

 

http://www.dailywire...-james-barrett#

 

 

 

Hate to break it to you, but you're out of luck, buddy. 

that is literally fake news and conservative propaganda it's pretty obvious when the opening is bible verses and the ending is climate change denial. and now i need bleach for my eyes. I don't know why someone at fox news said a lie but I assume he should be fired for it. anyway the other point the video made was the cia can access us citizen's emails and call it a investigation when the fact is the cia can't just investigate your emails without a warrant so the cia cannot secretly get the emails and blame the russians. here is the public evidence that the russians interfered in the election http://shorturl.at/ELMOP

not to mention even donald trump admitted russia hacked hillary's emails after he was briefed by the intelligence community which included the classified evidence

Edited by totherpage95, 14 March 2017 - 03:18 AM.

[Setto Kaiba]

that is literally fake news and conservative propaganda it's pretty obvious when the opening is bible verses and the ending is climate change denial. and now i need bleach for my eyes. I don't know why someone at fox news said a lie but I assume he should be fired for it. anyway the other point the video made was the cia can access us citizen's emails and call it a investigation when the fact is the cia can't just investigate your emails without a warrant so the cia cannot secretly get the emails and blame the russians. here is the public evidence that the russians interfered in the election http://shorturl.at/ELMOP

not to mention even donald trump admitted russia hacked hillary's emails after he was briefed by the intelligence community which included the classified evidence

Um, I hate to break it to you, but even NASA has debunked the global warming BS

 

http://www.newsmax.c...1/01/id/700061/.

 

 

https://stevengoddar...cience-at-nasa/

 

 

 

Nice try, though. If you think I'm going to believe what some politician or professor says about Climate change over NASA you've got another thing coming. 

 

Conservative propaganda, huh? Hmm. Seems like anything I post would be Conservative propaganda because it doesn't meet your political views. 

Edited by Setto Kaiba, 14 March 2017 - 03:59 AM.

[totherpage95]

Um, I hate to break it to you, but even NASA has debunked the global warming BS

 

http://www.newsmax.c...1/01/id/700061/.

 

 

https://stevengoddar...cience-at-nasa/

 

 

 

Nice try, though. If you think I'm going to believe what some politician or professor says about Climate change over NASA you've got another thing coming. 

 

Conservative propaganda, huh? Hmm. Seems like anything I post would be Conservative propaganda because it doesn't meet your political views. 

it's not my political views it's the truth its all propaganda. the truth is scientists around the world have proven the temperature is getting warmer every year because of human's use of coal,c02, and natural gas. no one at nasa believes climate change isn't real because it's a real fact like how the majority of your body is water it isn't my opinion i don't actually care about if we use wind or solar or oil or coal energy because of politics i care because the planet is going to become too hot to live comfortably if we don't take action now. if you actually went to school and really researched this you wouldn't say that i am saying climate change is real because of politics. in fact i can even use this form https://www.nasa.gov...estion-for-nasa to ask nasa if its real 

Edited by totherpage95, 14 March 2017 - 05:37 AM.

[T XD]

Climate change isn't real ?

 

- The ice is melting in the North Pole and South Pole.

- Cold climate regions and regions that has 4 seasons climate are having less and less winter at least every 2 to 3 years.

- Hot climate regions are having very high temperature degrees at least every 2 to 3 years especially during the vernal and estival seasons of the Earth's orbit.

- Hot climate regions are witnessing unusual winter during the hibernal season of the Earth's orbit.

[Setto Kaiba]

Climate change isn't real ?

 

- The ice is melting in the North Pole and South Pole.

- Cold climate regions and regions that has 4 seasons climate are having less and less winter at least every 2 to 3 years.

- Hot climate regions are having very high temperature degrees at least every 2 to 3 years especially during the vernal and estival seasons of the Earth's orbit.

- Hot climate regions are witnessing unusual winter during the hibernal season of the Earth's orbit.

NASA's word against yours. 

 

It amazes me how many people fall for this load of BS. 

 

Recent studies show the ice caps are getting bigger. 

 

https://www.nasa.gov...er-than-losses/

 

Point number 2 and 3, that probably because our nearest STAR has been heating up for the past multiple years, but has started to cool itself down a bit.

 

http://www.express.c...-solar-activity

 

 

So, climate change exists in terms of winter, spring, summer and fall, but nothing else. They've been trying to call for Climate change for years, constantly putting down dates for when some major catastrophe was supposed to happen, and guess what? They were proven wrong EVERY SINGLE TIME! That is exactly why more and more people are abandoning this dead horse. But far left liberals continue insist that something exists when it doesn't! 

 

http://www.dailywire...hoax-john-nolte

 

 

And even if it did exist, you know how much the ocean is supposed to rise in the next 100 years? About a foot. Yeah, real life threatening. 

 

https://www.forbes.c...s/#64062ce01194

Edited by Setto Kaiba, 14 March 2017 - 02:46 PM.

[totherpage95]

  the sad thing is this guy probably isn't even a troll he's just ignorant 

[BlueStarSaber]

Ok I took a look at that Nasa ice caps are getting bigger link and it has this 

 

But it might only take a few decades for Antarctica’s growth to reverse, according to Zwally. “If the losses of the Antarctic Peninsula and parts of West Antarctica continue to increase at the same rate they’ve been increasing for the last two decades, the losses will catch up with the long-term gain in East Antarctica in 20 or 30 years -- I don’t think there will be enough snowfall increase to offset these losses.”

 

So while it might be increasing right now it will decrease in the following decades again and we won't recover the loses.

Besides they still have their evidence page on climate change https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/

Edited by BlueStarSaber, 14 March 2017 - 09:29 PM.

[Setto Kaiba]

  the sad thing is this guy probably isn't even a troll he's just ignorant 

Or, you know, I just look up actual facts. 

 

The bright side of all this, be it Climate change is real or not, Scientists may be finding a new form of energy that puts oil and coal industries in the dust. Nuclear Salt reactors will probably take over, and they're far more efficiant than that Green energy crap that takes a million years to pay for itself. Just a tiny little bit of it could power an entire state for the next ten generations. We're about to be living in science fiction. 

 

Here's a video. 

 

 

On the topic of "Climate Change" I think we'll just have to agree to disagree. I'm not going to convince you, and you're not going to convince me. 

[Setto Kaiba]

Ok I took a look at that Nasa ice caps are getting bigger link and it has this 

 

So while it might be increasing right now it will decrease in the following decades again and we won't recover the loses.

Besides they still have their evidence page on climate change https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/

Yeah, well, when science can tell me EXACTLY how the weather is going to be next Wednesday, I'll start taking climate change seriously. It's a major hoax you've all fallen for. All these "Evil rich white guys" living in their mansions are probably laughing at how gullible people are, but hey...just my opinion.  

 

 

 

https://powerglobal....uman-history-2/

 

http://www.livescien...ess-mapped.html

Edited by Setto Kaiba, 14 March 2017 - 10:38 PM.

[totherpage95]

Or, you know, I just look up actual facts. 
 
The bright side of all this, be it Climate change is real or not, Scientists may be finding a new form of energy that puts oil and coal industries in the dust. Nuclear Salt reactors will probably take over, and they're far more efficiant than that Green energy crap that takes a million years to pay for itself. Just a tiny little bit of it could power an entire state for the next ten generations. We're about to be living in science fiction. 
 
Here's a video. https://www.youtube....h?v=xIDytUCRtTA
 
 
On the topic of "Climate Change" I think we'll just have to agree to disagree. I'm not going to convince you, and you're not going to convince me. 

"actual facts"you haven't posted any facts except for that nasa page and that opinion page someone wrote. the rest are opinions. you don't know the difference between facts and opinions and why put "climate change" in quotes? its a fact its not up for debate everyone except republicans acknowledge it is real ( not to mention its just like trump's tweets where he puts quotes around words)

[rocci]

I think Climate change is real.
Why many people deny it? What will they get from that?