I'm not saying that I would refuse to accept Sasuke's ultimate redemption. Since I do not know the method it will come about, I can't say what I will think of it. All I mean is that it is the primary basis for me not liking SK. You seem to be saying that illegimate, I do not think so.
Like I said, I would be okay with forgiving him, but not starting a family with him.
Sorry, I'm a little confused with the bolded. You're saying that I'm telling something illegitimate? I'm not following.
Not wanting Sasuke to have a family is the moral line you impose on him, but that's your own. Kishimoto might not agree with you on it, he could, but I'm not sure if that's what he wants given how he wants us to feel sorry for Sasuke.
The point is the moral line is the one the author establishes. It's ok for you to disagree with the decision but at least I hope you understand why such a decision is made in the first place. It's not that the author doesn't care about the implications it can have on the audience, it's that the author might just think that given the fictional nature of the work that it might not be judged in the same level as it would in real life.

No offense but I don't see how you can compare between db and Naruto, db never tried to convey any message it was all about fights, Naruto is trying to convey a moral message altough it fail at that.
No offense but given that we weren't supposed to feel sorry for Vegeta and that there isn't any message in having him become a good guy that just makes his change way more strange than anything Sasuke could offer.
At least Sasuke has some backing for becoming good again. Vegeta kinda just happened, just for the sake of having him on the good side.
Saying that it's ok for Vegeta to be good but not for Sasuke is a terrible double standard that I can't believe people are actually defending.