In order for Obi/Rin to be a complete parallel of NS Rin must have feelings for Obito too. I'm going to stick with my theory that she realized her feelings for him shortly after the boulder incident. The part when she was gazing into the stars must be her thinking of her feelings for Obito. I think Sakura knows she loves Naruto but she still hasn't realize how much she loves him because what's preventing her are the small remains of her feelings for Sasuke. If Naruto experiences a life and death situation it will be the last straw to break away any feelings she has for him and truly embrace what she feels for Naruto just like Rin, only difference he won't die. This could be where Kishi is heading otherwise what will be the point of him keep bringing Obito's feelings for Rin at this point of the manga?
This!!!^^
I never said you said narusaku was the most popular. I was just pointing out that you forgot that these are private events, anybody can set up an "event," but it isn't solid proof you would use in a debate.
It doesn't matter if the source is from WSJ. The problem is not the source. The problem is that it is a poll.
Have you heard of the famous 1936 Literary Digest Poll? Reputable, respected newspaper, with the most accurate predictions regarding the elections, somehow managed to get the election results completely wrong in 1936. Alfred Landon, the Republican, lost to Franklin D. Roosevelt
Why was it wrong? Selection bias and nonresponse bias. The people who were polled were people who owned telephones, which was very expensive back in the day, and we all know by now that most of the wealthy vote for the Republicans. Secondly, only 24% of the intended 10 million people surveyed actually responded.
Similarly, the people selected (well, voted) in these WSJ polls are not an accurate reflection of people who read Naruto. The people who voted in the polls were people who bought the magazines legally, and bothered to fill out a form. Therefore WSJ polls have a selection bias and nonresponse bias, and may or may not represent the true opinion of all the fans in Japan. (Other food for thought would be whether a person was allowed to vote for more than one character, or whether a person could have bought more than one magazine and voted for the same character several times).
There is a reason why big companies spend millions of dollars on research -- even if it means paying the participants just for their opinion on the colour of their cereal boxes. A poll is not the epitome of true public opinion research, therefore you can't say my statement "suggests nothing is accurate." I am not suggesting nothing is accurate. I am suggesting this flawed understanding of statistics (by the fandom in general) is flawed.
The reason I am telling you this is because I want you to understand the flaws these polls carry, and how easily they can be used by the antis the same way. Take this Crunchyroll poll for example -- Sakura is voted as one of the most annoying characters.
Unless the poll was conducted by randomly selecting a >10% of the population of Japan, the "votes" you counted don't accurately reflect the Japanese fandom at all. Therefore my argument is not debunked.
I am saying that based on flawed polls, if we assume is correct, can just as easily indicate that Sakura's popularity was a result of the fact that she was in the manga for the first few polls, ie she had a head start, while Hinata had the disadvantage of not being in the manga. I may not be a Hinata fan, but I guarantee that if you throw that argument into a pairing debate with other people, someone will point this out.
I apologize if this may seem to be very forthcoming, but I'm not pointing out a difference of opinion we have. I'm pointing out that the truth is, these poll results we have is neither statistically valid or reliable.
Yeah its alright :)
And well honeslty, what your saying is right and im not denying that-regarding your theory about 'accuracy' but seriously, thats just not solid proof especially especially considering how popular sakura, shikamaru, naruto, kakashi, sasuke and all those top ten's are, but since sakura is the heroine of the series ofcoarse shes gonna have better votes! Thats just how it is! Hinata isn't to be compared to sakura at all! She's an insignificant side character-I repeat insignificant side character, so no, its not a matter of disadvantage, what your saying about hinata and her "advantage" doesnt matter so at the end of the day plus, that can easily be said for shikamaru and lee who have appeared at the same time as hinata, and yet beat her through the roof just like sakura. So no, your argument is completely invalid. Also, the WSJ is the official, most accurate and the poll that masashi kishimoti dealed with of the manga NARUTO, whether you, me or any fan likes it or not. I dunno why your making things confusing but like seriously, what your saying just-I cant-your trying to say that the popularity poll of the official WSJ is wrong...or not accurate or whatever, but seriously, sometimes its just not good to look to deep into things when its right there. And no matter what arguments that are presented, there's absolutely no denying that hinata's popularity is anywhere near sakura, naruto, kakashi, sasuke, shikamaru and all of those top 10 characters of naruto. Absolutely no way.
Edited by Canadian_DJ, 04 July 2013 - 01:27 PM.