In your opinion. There are multitudes of people who do not agree with either point of your assessment. If for some people the setup of the romances was obvious since the first book, and they recognized the author's clues as the story progressed, obviously for those readers it was neither sudden, nor poorly explained, nor "lame."
And the exact same thing is going to happen in this fandom. Assuming that NS is indeed confirmed by the conclusion of the manga (or upcoming movie), once it's all over there will be people who will continue to deny that NS was ever foreshadowed. There will be people who say that Sakura's feelings changing to Naruto was sudden, poorly explained, lame, etc. That NH and SS would have been better. That they were misled by the author's terrible writing, yadda, yadda, yadda.
It's just part of the deal with the interpretation of art or literature. What's interesting to me is that readers frequently believe their interpretation carries more weight than authorial intent (especially when that intent is clearly vocalized), and if there is a mismatch it is the author's fault for writing poorly instead of the reader's fault for misinterpreting.
Sometimes it is the writer's fault, but it is a more difficult case to win when many readers can and do interpret the author's intentions just fine.
Kishimoto has made a number of glaring mistakes with his story, but I don't think the implementation of his intentions regarding the final pairing is going to be one of them.
Yes, obviously its my opinion ![]()
Rest of your post- Agreed.
EDIT: I have to ask, since you seem to be a Harry Potter series fan like me, Were you happy with the way Rowling made Ron-Hermione official? So Ron says something caring about house-elves and that's enough for Hermione to forget the situation of war and kiss Ron. Really?!
Edited by ns.Believe.It, 15 September 2014 - 05:38 PM.



















