I don't understand why we have to be so concerned about what other fans think about Sakura or NaruSaku. It's annoying that some people dislike her character and downplay her moments, but why seek out their opinion then? Sawyer7Mage and Forneverworld are regular fans of the series, just like the rest of us, so why is what they have to say so important to some? When someone offends you, normally you would ignore them or avoid them entirely. Why continue to annoy yourselves by tuning into their videos - specifically their pairing and anti-Sakura videos? I'll never understand.
This is a very good and very practical post. I'll never understand it either. It kind of reminds me of people who can't look away from a horrific accident. Curiosity compels them to look at the bloody carnage, but then they complain of being sickened or emotionally scarred as a result.
It's axiomatic: if you can't handle it, don't look.
Even if you're someone who can handle it, there are many who get upset by the frequently harsh viewpoints of opposing fandoms, and who would prefer not to see/hear it. I personally believe that's a fact worth considering before introducing opposing fandom meta for discussion.
Just my opinion.
I can't help but feel that Itachi's words relating to Kushina are going to be to distorted by others to create the impression that Hinata's actions in 615 are what he was implying. Besides that, I enjoyed reading that post, it's very thought provoking.
But why should that matter? There are
always going to be naysayers and deniers. Always. Even when it comes to things that are not subjective like the interpretation of fiction.
For example, there are people who deny the holocaust ever happened. There are people who deny that men walked on the moon. It doesn't matter that the rational majority know these events occurred, or that there is a mountain of evidence -- A/V, forensic, and eye witness -- that documents those events. There are still some who search for contrary "facts" or any possible loophole to exploit, and when they can't find any simply resort to wild theories to explain what they prefer to believe.
I'm not suggesting that denying the likelihood of NS is equivalent to denying man has landed on the moon. The story isn't over, and none of us can know with 100% certainty until Kishimoto's final pencil stroke is published.
My point is, the manga itself is a "mountain of evidence" that documents the
likelihood of NS. The fact that some fans interpret it differently or prefer to believe differently and counter that evidence with denial or "distortion" is to be expected. We shouldn't be concerned over expected behavior, or be afraid to have confidence in our viewpoint because contrary viewpoints exist.
And if we end up being wrong about NS? Then we're wrong. I'm pretty sure the sun will continue to rise and set anyway.