54216 replies to this topic

[questdrivencollie]

Edit war! jk...

 

Had that happen with me once on a wiki, and for some reason one of my edits got removed. Put it back and they took it down again. I don't know why, it wasn't anything particularly disagreeable. I think it was some info on Star Wars vehicles, and I added something from one of the EU novels I had read...or something.

[NaruSaku fan in Kentucky]

I swear whoever runs it is a NaruHina fan.

[Uzumaki9000]

I swear whoever runs it is a NaruHina fan.

And a Sasusaku fan.

[Luna]

Does anyone even use Narutopedia? LOL. Sakura's page is full of biased assumptions made by NH AND SS fans.

[questdrivencollie]

I never really read much of Sakura's page. But in reading Naruto's page, as a new fan earlier this year, it did give me a false impression of Hinata's role.

[NaruSaku fan in Kentucky]

Does anyone even use Narutopedia? LOL. Sakura's page is full of biased assumptions made by NH AND SS fans.

Like saying Kishi's said that Sakura wasn't meant to be main character?

[Change]

Only meant that her focus is on the battle. And since Naruto has also been mostly serious in this battle, she hasn't really had an opportunity or need to go tsundere on him.

That's what I'm saying, there's no need for a tsundere moment to happen in a battle(unless like you said Naruto is doing something stupid or we.)

[Luna]

I never really read much of Sakura's page. But in reading Naruto's page, as a new fan earlier this year, it did give me a false impression of Hinata's role.

When NS becomes canon they're going to remove Sakura's page. LOL

Like saying Kishi's said that Sakura wasn't meant to be main character?

I don't even think he said that. I don't even look at her page. I'm too busy to worry about trivial things like editing a page.

Edited by Baka chan, 22 August 2014 - 03:48 AM.

[MangaReader]

You'd figure if you were the owner of a site... you'd be as un-bias as you possible could

[NaruSaku fan in Kentucky]

When NS becomes canon they're going to remove Sakura's page. LOLI don't even think he said that. I don't even look at her page. I'm too busy to worry about trivial things like editing a page.

Me neither But Sakura's page said that.

[soraandven]

http://youtu.be/RLG5...bL5fvl0KEYdZFLw kushina

[BlazingDynamo]

What about the data books on Sakura? Wasn't one of them made by Kishi?

[Atheck]

Does anyone even use Narutopedia? LOL. Sakura's page is full of biased assumptions made by NH AND SS fans.

 

It's useful for looking up specific chapter and page references. The editors might have a tendency to write in a slanted way when the subject matter relates to the more ambivalent facets of the manga like characterisation, but they are effective at cataloguing techniques, feats, and Databook stats. In those areas, they do a respectable job as an information source, in my opinion.

[KnS]

Does anyone even use Narutopedia? LOL. Sakura's page is full of biased assumptions made by NH AND SS fans.

 

Yeah, it's insanely biased.  I only use it to look up technical stuff or minor characters.  If I read the pages of the main characters I might get an aneurysm.   

[Change]

I agree, I have never seen somebody use the naruto wiki page to find information about pairings and stuff like that

Only for techniques, databooks, and chapters

Because everybody knows that kitten is fan made

Edited by TheMagicConch, 22 August 2014 - 04:26 AM.

[TouKen4Life3g]

So what I missed?

[Khaleesi]

We need to make a new and true version 

[MangaReader]

So what I missed?

You missed the Apocalypse, we're all dead don't you know : ) 

[TouKen4Life3g]

You missed the Apocalypse, we're all dead don't you know : ) 

Oh that make sense.

[MangaReader]

Oh that make sense.

But the real note is we're apparently talking about Narutopedia... And it's negligence to correct it's biased mistakes