QUOTE
Can't recall exactly when Mazinger Z came out, but if it wasn't her it certainly was Lady Oscar from Rose of Versailles- Riyoko Ikeda's most famous shoujo manga. I've never seen her run down either. I'm thinking Rose of Versailles may predate Mazinger Z but I'm not certain (Rose of Versailles ran in manga form 1971-3, but it wasn't animated until almost a decade later, definitely after Mazinger Z was animated.)
Mazinger-Z's manga came out in October-1972 and it was animated two months later. Thus, Rose of Versailles certainly came out first.
Usually I preffer avoiding overly categorical phrasings such like "Book/show/game X was the first in using Trope Y ever!" because there always is the possibility of that trope was used earlier in some series you don't know about. And I often run into young fans who think their beloved series is completely original. So I preffer playing it safe.
Often I found that mentality between Evangelion fans who think that nineties anime is incredibly original despite of it does nothing -NOTHING!- I haven't seen done thousand times in older anime series, whether they featured gigantic robots or not (the end of Neon Genesis Evangelion heavily borrows elements of the end of Space Runaway Ideon, for example). Or among Naruto fans who believe Dragon Ball (I refuse calling it DBZ unless I'm specifically talking about thatrun of the anime) is Kishimoto's only inspiration, like if it was the first shonen manga ever! It gets annoying.
QUOTE
Lady Oscar herself is a fleshing out of Tezuka's Princess Knight/Ribbon Knight, making it much more realistic- and less insulting to women At the time Tezuka wrote his manga (1950's) beliefs about male and female "innate" behaviors were rather backward, but by the time Ikeda wrote Rose of Versailles the second wave of the women's movement was in full flower and having influencing images of how female characters acted all across the industrialized world.
I know what kind of manga is Rose of Versailles and its a classic shojo manga. I haven't read it (albeit it has been translated in Spanish by Akaze Ediciones if I'm not mistaken), but I wouldn't mind. Thank you for your warning but don't worry: I know it's a very tragic story.
However I have read Tezuka's Ribbon no Kishi. I liked, but sometimes I couldn't help to think "I don't think one woman would like this scene". Then again, it was written in the fifties. If Tezuka was going to write Jungle Emperor today (that manga Disney didn't blatantly and shamelessly rip off when they made The Lion King. Not at all

), I'm certain he would portray the African people very differently.
QUOTE
Definitely. Naruto seems to have come at least partly to accept Sakura loves him now and no longer loves Sasuke, and seems to have decided he will drop the POAL as far as it is connected to her, but he won't give up on chasing down Sasuke and believing he can be redeemed. Seriously, the only viable ships now are Narusaku and Narusasu.
Well, when I read chapter 470's first pages, it seemed Sakura's words were getting through his thick, titanium-plated skull, but he yet couldn't fully accepting it -or believing it-.
There will NOT be NaruSasu. I'm utterly and downright sure of it. Though I have ran into NaruSasu fans claiming their ship is already practically canon just because Naruto still feels or believes he can or must or needs saving Sasuke from himself.
QUOTE
the only relationship that got torpedoed in Naruto was NaruHina. Any possibility of NaruHina was sunk when after her glorious confession, she watched Sakura and Naruto hug romantically from the sidelines with a warm and accepting smile on her face, and then promptly vanished back into obscurity.
Quite true, Catsi.
QUOTE
wow rofl.
never would've expected Pokemon to have crazy pairing wars >.<
Oh, it does. Believe me. It does.
Usually I -thankfully- miss them because I stopped watching Pokemon several years ago, and I like pretending the cartoon ended after the first season. But back then I also found heavy Misty-bashing.
I am a Ash/Misty (or Satoshi/Kasumi) shipper, and I see no reason to stop being.
QUOTE
It's funny that now NH fans are claiming Yamato's almost admission of love is now meaningless because he showed anger at Sakura during the confession XD I wonder then, what was the point of the scene?
...
What?
How does that scene nullifies the older one?
As far as I'm concerned, Yamato was angry at Sakura for she was asking Naruto dropping the promise and stopping chasing Sasuke (He didn't get angry at her when she was confessing at all). And I think this theory of mine is way likelier and more logical than the "Yamato was going to talk about Sakura's confidence issues" nosense.
I'm sick of shippers' dumb excuses. Once again, they're grasping at straws, looking for anything in order to go on believing whatever they want believing, disregarding the manga's evolution and plot's development.
By the way, some NH fans have manipulated chapter 469's pages, replacing Sakura with Hinata (right like they did with the "meaningless, sisterly" hug in chapter 450). This is too rich. If that confession was so awful, why are they stealing it? If Sakura was being so selfish, why are they replacing her with Hinata? If Naruto rejected Sakura why are they swapping her with Hinata?