Sarada has her mother's face. The only thing she has in common with Karin are the glasses and there are many characters who also have that in common. Why would Kishi give Sarada pink hair when he could give her black hair? This is a nonsense question. Why didn't he give Himawari (Sunflower) blonde hair?
None of the pairing sides acknowledge each other, including the couplings you are supporting in this thread. What's your point?
Amegakure is very industrial, not traditional japan like the Leaf at all.
It's insulting when you're making the argument that she'd adopt Sasuke's child with another woman. Sakura loves Sasuke, you heard her in chapter 693. It's one thing to defend Sakura to love two men. It's another to deny Sakura her own character (as you're also denying her child, I'm not surprised).
You really think it's confusing?
I have read the summary someone made, which is in the last 5 pages.
It was never said Byakugan was a dominant trait. Since Hagoromo didn't have the Byakugan even though Kaguya had it, we can safely say it can skip children. Naruto's whiskers were there when he was born and he wasn't a jinchuriki then, his mother was.
Sarada having glasses is simply a design choice that you're looking too much into. Minato looked like Naruto, so yeah they were related. However, Pain also looked like Naruto (more than Minato) and yet they were not related (yet there were theories that they were simply because of this design choice). Lee and Gai are another pair that strongly resemble each other yet they're not related. Do not forget, the only resemblance Karin has is the glasses, because Sarada has Sakura's face.
If it's wish fulfillment for everyone, then why are you coming up with theories about Hinata having children with Toneri or Lee (she wouldn't wish for this), Sakura to be Bolt's mother (Hinata wouldn't wish for this), Sasuke having a kid with Karin (Sasuke wouldn't wish for this), Sakura adopting a kid (Sakura wouldn't wish for this)?
So it's not possible to criticize this? Point out the flaws in this theory? I'm asking this sincerely. I don't want any trouble.
As I said before, this theory doesn't solve anything and only adds more problems. Some are saying that the last chapters contradict what Kishi has written, but how is making Naruto fail to save everyone from the Infinite Tsukuyomi not contracting of his heroic status?
So you think 699 and 700 are not confusing?
As I recall, kakashi is the Hokage. We don't see naruto until the end as a Hokage. He failed. Do they still need ninjas anymore?