QUOTE
I think your opinion is also skewed by your interest in Sakura/Kabuto..
Yes, because I don't find the tragic tales of Hashirama and Madara as friends turned enemies to be all that exiting.
QUOTE
To reverse roles, I mean I was seriously bored with the Kabuto flashbacks, because for me I guess Kabuto isn't one of my favourite characters.
Good for you. I enjoyed the Kabuto flashbacks whilst finding these recent ones to be monotonous. One notable difference was that the Kabuto flashback wasn't excessively long. IIRC it was about three chapters then it shifted back to the present. This one has been going since 620 and it appears as though it will be continuing for a minimum of 5-6 chapters excluding any potential resolving conversations afterwards.
QUOTE
I'm interested in Sakura but I've been waiting for ages to see a story about the Founders' generation, so I find the flashbacks interesting.
I was actually interested in it as well but for me at least the characters and perpetual recycling of rivals or individuals who may have at one point been companions but are now enemies has been overplayed. It's also due in part to the excessive victimization of the characters. Sure there needs to be some explanation and depth to villains as significant as Madara but depth does not have to nor should it always equate to victimization or ethical ambiguity to such large degrees that we're now debating over whether someone as evil as Orochimaru can't be JnJ'ed.
QUOTE
Imo I disagree that the character relationships are unimaginative, because Madara and Hashirama are quite different from Sasuke and Naruto because it's quite clear they were good friends who acknowledged one another,
That's what the entire foundation of the Sasuke and Naruto relationship has been about. The only difference is that they were more open in their friendship whereas the SN equivalent was short-lived and very questionable in its implications of the two characters being actual friends with each other.
For once I would like to see a relationship that did not involve that concept.
QUOTE
and it's not themselves stopping one another from being friends but all the clan rivalry and politics. That's pretty different from the Sasuke-Naruto thing.
Sasuke and Naruto are products of their own environments just as Madara and Hashirama were. Naruto was instilled with the Will of Fire and the philosophical beliefs of the Senju whereas Sasuke decided to embrace his clan's apparent destiny of hatred after Itachi instilled in him the traditional values of the Uchiha Clan which include the obtainment of power and one's ambitions being fulfilled through the usage of force which can be traced back to the Older Son's ideals of peace involving the usage of force.
The only notable differences are that with Sasuke and Naruto's generation both of their clans have been almost completely wiped out and so their realization of their respective clans' destinies is a tad more subtle.
QUOTE
Plus, Madara and Hashirama's fates have been mentioned to be similar to Sasuke and Naruto since P1,
That merely exemplifies Kishi's capacity to plan out yet another parallel years before actually providing focus to it. It doesn't refute the notion that Kishi is being unoriginal with these characters.
QUOTE
and honestly I always thought there were plenty of hints that their relationship was something more than a flimsily pieced together alliance of convenience.
Look at the answer above this one.
QUOTE
I mean they completely founded an organisation that changed the shinobi system...
This and the origins of the shinobi system are probably the only unique concepts being introduced with these flashbacks. The conflict between the Senju and Uchiha, the friendship/rivalry/war between Hashirama and Madara, and the fatalistic mindsets of certain characters like Hashirama's father which we've been seeing examples of throughout the entire manga as far back as the Land of Waves arc arguably are, to me at least, merely the rehashing of the same old plot points.
Perhaps you're right, but I just don't see it from your perspective and TBH I don't think I'd want to.
QUOTE
to me that takes some initiative and I enjoy these flashbacks because things make more sense now as Madara seems more complex, not just some warmongering fool bent on vengeance who can't countenance peace.
I referenced this several answers above. Complexity is nice, particularly for your primary antagonists, but don't rehash the monotonous concepts of parallelism and moral ambiguity once again. Admittedly if this were before we started receiving so many stories of antagonists who's tales depict them as misguided individuals then perhaps the parallel would work better but when you're this far into the manga and with so many characters having already been given those qualities they lose their impact IMO.